Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms

Robert Brandom famously attempts to provide an account of norms that are grounded in intersubjective practices, so dealing with problems raised by Wittgenstein’s regress arguments. This relies upon providing an explanation of the correctness of those practices in terms of our dispositions to treat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: James Trafford
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3638b27bf4d2465d8b55b2dcf9892c4c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3638b27bf4d2465d8b55b2dcf9892c4c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3638b27bf4d2465d8b55b2dcf9892c4c2021-12-02T12:19:25ZReconstructing Intersubjective Norms10.13128/Phe_Mi-224402280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/3638b27bf4d2465d8b55b2dcf9892c4c2017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7300https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Robert Brandom famously attempts to provide an account of norms that are grounded in intersubjective practices, so dealing with problems raised by Wittgenstein’s regress arguments. This relies upon providing an explanation of the correctness of those practices in terms of our dispositions to treat each other’s practices as correct or incorrect. The view faces a number of hurdles, however, particularly when it comes to providing a non-circular account of the norms of practice, from within those practices themselves. This essay argues that Brandom’s attempt to ground norms in intersubjective practices is circular, and requires communal stability. I go on to suggest that, by taking practices of interaction as foundational, we can ground norms in action coordination. Norms, on this view, become sedimented through our interactions, and explicit normative talk is required to keep our interactions coherent with each other. James TraffordRosenberg & SellierarticlenormsintersubjectiveinteractionAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 13 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic norms
intersubjective
interaction
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle norms
intersubjective
interaction
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
James Trafford
Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
description Robert Brandom famously attempts to provide an account of norms that are grounded in intersubjective practices, so dealing with problems raised by Wittgenstein’s regress arguments. This relies upon providing an explanation of the correctness of those practices in terms of our dispositions to treat each other’s practices as correct or incorrect. The view faces a number of hurdles, however, particularly when it comes to providing a non-circular account of the norms of practice, from within those practices themselves. This essay argues that Brandom’s attempt to ground norms in intersubjective practices is circular, and requires communal stability. I go on to suggest that, by taking practices of interaction as foundational, we can ground norms in action coordination. Norms, on this view, become sedimented through our interactions, and explicit normative talk is required to keep our interactions coherent with each other.
format article
author James Trafford
author_facet James Trafford
author_sort James Trafford
title Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
title_short Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
title_full Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
title_fullStr Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
title_full_unstemmed Reconstructing Intersubjective Norms
title_sort reconstructing intersubjective norms
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/3638b27bf4d2465d8b55b2dcf9892c4c
work_keys_str_mv AT jamestrafford reconstructingintersubjectivenorms
_version_ 1718394506886250496