Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication
The results of the study of feedback in the Russian oral dialogical discourse are presented in the article. The relevance of this study is due to several factors. First, the debatable issue is related to the qualification of fragments of oral discourse from the point of view of their relevance to th...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | RU |
Publicado: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/365ee00cbc734b098361e851c4124524 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:365ee00cbc734b098361e851c4124524 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:365ee00cbc734b098361e851c41245242021-12-02T07:58:13ZOrganization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-1-29-47https://doaj.org/article/365ee00cbc734b098361e851c41245242021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2293https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The results of the study of feedback in the Russian oral dialogical discourse are presented in the article. The relevance of this study is due to several factors. First, the debatable issue is related to the qualification of fragments of oral discourse from the point of view of their relevance to the genre of monologue, dialogue, polylogue. Secondly, there is a number of theoretical problems arising from such qualifications, in particular, in the scientific description of feedback markers (based on the material of the Russian language), a rather large number of gaps are found. The definitions of the terms feedback and feedback markers are provided in the article. The authors note that it seems advisable to consider feedback markers in a somewhat expanded way, including in this group not only units used to express positive attention, but also units that can signal difficulties in perceiving the interlocutor’s utterance, as well as illocutionary forced units that are a reaction to the initial a replica of the interlocutor. Criteria for the inclusion of units functioning within the vocal modality in the group of feedback markers are proposed. A classification of feedback markers based on the ability of units to collapse the proposition contained in the statement of the interlocutor is proposed. The quantitative characteristics of the described subgroups are presented.O. L. MikhalevaU. E. ChekmezTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleoral discoursedialogicalnessfeedbackfeedback markersSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 29-47 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
RU |
topic |
oral discourse dialogicalness feedback feedback markers Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
spellingShingle |
oral discourse dialogicalness feedback feedback markers Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 O. L. Mikhaleva U. E. Chekmez Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
description |
The results of the study of feedback in the Russian oral dialogical discourse are presented in the article. The relevance of this study is due to several factors. First, the debatable issue is related to the qualification of fragments of oral discourse from the point of view of their relevance to the genre of monologue, dialogue, polylogue. Secondly, there is a number of theoretical problems arising from such qualifications, in particular, in the scientific description of feedback markers (based on the material of the Russian language), a rather large number of gaps are found. The definitions of the terms feedback and feedback markers are provided in the article. The authors note that it seems advisable to consider feedback markers in a somewhat expanded way, including in this group not only units used to express positive attention, but also units that can signal difficulties in perceiving the interlocutor’s utterance, as well as illocutionary forced units that are a reaction to the initial a replica of the interlocutor. Criteria for the inclusion of units functioning within the vocal modality in the group of feedback markers are proposed. A classification of feedback markers based on the ability of units to collapse the proposition contained in the statement of the interlocutor is proposed. The quantitative characteristics of the described subgroups are presented. |
format |
article |
author |
O. L. Mikhaleva U. E. Chekmez |
author_facet |
O. L. Mikhaleva U. E. Chekmez |
author_sort |
O. L. Mikhaleva |
title |
Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
title_short |
Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
title_full |
Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
title_fullStr |
Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organization of Oral Dialogical Discourse: Feedback and Ways of Its Explication |
title_sort |
organization of oral dialogical discourse: feedback and ways of its explication |
publisher |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/365ee00cbc734b098361e851c4124524 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olmikhaleva organizationoforaldialogicaldiscoursefeedbackandwaysofitsexplication AT uechekmez organizationoforaldialogicaldiscoursefeedbackandwaysofitsexplication |
_version_ |
1718398778460864512 |