Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method

In this study, results from long-term monitoring of the tyre/road noises of the exposed aggregate cement concrete (EACC) with the highest grain size of 8 mm and stone mastic asphalt (SMA) surface with the highest grain size of 11 mm performed by close-proximity (CPX) method are presented. There are...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Blanka Hablovicova, Vitezslav Krivanek, Petra Markova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	tyre/road noise stone mastic asphalt exposed aggregate cement concrete close-proximity method Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/36951a4e6ac748c8a4f42ec788c0a9af
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:36951a4e6ac748c8a4f42ec788c0a9af
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:36951a4e6ac748c8a4f42ec788c0a9af2021-11-11T15:23:47ZComparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method10.3390/app1121103592076-3417https://doaj.org/article/36951a4e6ac748c8a4f42ec788c0a9af2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10359https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417In this study, results from long-term monitoring of the tyre/road noises of the exposed aggregate cement concrete (EACC) with the highest grain size of 8 mm and stone mastic asphalt (SMA) surface with the highest grain size of 11 mm performed by close-proximity (CPX) method are presented. There are certain concerns that the EACC surface will have inferior noise properties than SMA. These concerns are based on previous experience with the cement concrete surface with transverse tining texture which is very noisy. The main aim of this article is to demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded. A section of the motorway was chosen for the measuring and the testing speed for all measurements was 80 km·h<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Provisional results (based on six years of monitoring) show that the noise levels measured on both these surface types are similar over their lifetime and exhibit logarithmic acoustic behaviour.Blanka HablovicovaVitezslav KrivanekPetra MarkovaMDPI AGarticletyre/road noisestone mastic asphaltexposed aggregate cement concreteclose-proximity methodTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10359, p 10359 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	tyre/road noise stone mastic asphalt exposed aggregate cement concrete close-proximity method Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999
spellingShingle	tyre/road noise stone mastic asphalt exposed aggregate cement concrete close-proximity method Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Blanka Hablovicova Vitezslav Krivanek Petra Markova Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
description	In this study, results from long-term monitoring of the tyre/road noises of the exposed aggregate cement concrete (EACC) with the highest grain size of 8 mm and stone mastic asphalt (SMA) surface with the highest grain size of 11 mm performed by close-proximity (CPX) method are presented. There are certain concerns that the EACC surface will have inferior noise properties than SMA. These concerns are based on previous experience with the cement concrete surface with transverse tining texture which is very noisy. The main aim of this article is to demonstrate that these concerns are unfounded. A section of the motorway was chosen for the measuring and the testing speed for all measurements was 80 km·h<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. Provisional results (based on six years of monitoring) show that the noise levels measured on both these surface types are similar over their lifetime and exhibit logarithmic acoustic behaviour.
format	article
author	Blanka Hablovicova Vitezslav Krivanek Petra Markova
author_facet	Blanka Hablovicova Vitezslav Krivanek Petra Markova
author_sort	Blanka Hablovicova
title	Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
title_short	Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
title_full	Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
title_fullStr	Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method
title_sort	comparison of exposed aggregate cement concrete surface and stone mastic asphalt surface noise emissions by close-proximity method
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/36951a4e6ac748c8a4f42ec788c0a9af
work_keys_str_mv	AT blankahablovicova comparisonofexposedaggregatecementconcretesurfaceandstonemasticasphaltsurfacenoiseemissionsbycloseproximitymethod AT vitezslavkrivanek comparisonofexposedaggregatecementconcretesurfaceandstonemasticasphaltsurfacenoiseemissionsbycloseproximitymethod AT petramarkova comparisonofexposedaggregatecementconcretesurfaceandstonemasticasphaltsurfacenoiseemissionsbycloseproximitymethod
_version_	1718435359220563968

Comparison of Exposed Aggregate Cement Concrete Surface and Stone Mastic Asphalt Surface Noise Emissions by Close-Proximity Method

Ejemplares similares