Clinical outcomes following advanced respiratory motion management (respiratory gating or dynamic tumor tracking) with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer
Paul Aridgides,1 Tamara Nsouli,1 Rishabh Chaudhari,1 Russell Kincaid,1 Paula F Rosenbaum,2 Sean Tanny,1 Michael Mix,1 Jeffrey Bogart1 1Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA; 2Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medica...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/36ec38cf3b8c4d608ce88283fe166449 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Paul Aridgides,1 Tamara Nsouli,1 Rishabh Chaudhari,1 Russell Kincaid,1 Paula F Rosenbaum,2 Sean Tanny,1 Michael Mix,1 Jeffrey Bogart1 1Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA; 2Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA Purpose: To report the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to respiratory motion management method. Methods: Patients with stage I NSCLC who received SBRT from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. Computed tomography (CT) simulation with four-dimensional CT was performed for respiratory motion assessment. Tumor motion >1 cm in the craniocaudal direction was selectively treated with advanced respiratory management: either respiratory gating to a pre-specified portion of the respiratory cycle or dynamic tracking of an implanted fiducial marker. Comparisons were made with internal target volume approach, which treated all phases of respiratory motion. Results: Of 297 patients treated with SBRT at our institution, 51 underwent advanced respiratory management (48 with respiratory gating and three with tumor tracking) and 246 underwent all-phase treatment. Groups were similarly balanced with regard to mean age (P=0.242), tumor size (P=0.315), and histology (P=0.715). Tumor location in the lower lung lobes, as compared to middle or upper lobes, was more common in those treated with advanced respiratory management (78.4%) compared to all-phase treatment (25.6%, P<0.0001). There were 17 local recurrences in the treated lesions. Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that there were no differences with regard to mean time to local failure (91.5 vs 98.8 months, P=0.56), mean time to any failure (73.2 vs 78.7 months, P=0.73), or median overall survival (43.3 vs 45.5 months, P=0.56) between patients who underwent advanced respiratory motion management and all-phase treatment.Conclusion: SBRT with advanced respiratory management (the majority with respiratory gating) showed similar efficacy to all-phase treatment approach for stage I NSCLC. Keywords: SBRT, respiratory gating, lung cancer, radiation therapy, medically inoperable, stage I |
|---|