The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study

Abstract Background The prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in colorectal cancer patients has remained inconsistent between nonmetastatic and metastatic settings. So far, very few studies have included LDH in the prognostic analysis of curative‐intent surgery for colorectal liver metasta...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long Bai, Ze‐Yu Lin, Yun‐Xin Lu, Qin Chen, Han Zhou, Qi Meng, Chun‐Ping Lin, Wan‐Lan Huang, Yun‐Le Wan, Zhi‐Zhong Pan, De‐Shen Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/379bb3dd7c62469a931ce8bb0e4b0198
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:379bb3dd7c62469a931ce8bb0e4b0198
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:379bb3dd7c62469a931ce8bb0e4b01982021-11-22T09:08:47ZThe prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study2045-763410.1002/cam4.4315https://doaj.org/article/379bb3dd7c62469a931ce8bb0e4b01982021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4315https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7634Abstract Background The prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in colorectal cancer patients has remained inconsistent between nonmetastatic and metastatic settings. So far, very few studies have included LDH in the prognostic analysis of curative‐intent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Patients and Methods Five hundred and eighty consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative‐intent CRLM resection from Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center (434 patients) and Sun Yat‐sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital (146 patients) in 2000–2019 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Cox regression model was performed to identify the prognostic values of preoperative serum LDH levels and other clinicopathology variables. A modification of the established Fong CRS scoring system comprising LDH was developed within this Chinese population. Results At the median follow‐up time of 60.5 months, median OS was 59.5 months in the pooled cohort. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative LDH >upper limit of normal (250 U/L) was the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.44; p < 0.001). Patients with elevated LDH levels showed impaired OS than patients with normal LDH levels (27.6 months vs. 68.8 months). Five‐year survival rates were 53.7% and 22.5% in the LDH‐normal group and LDH‐high group, respectively. Similar results were also confirmed in each cohort. In the subgroup analysis, LDH could distinguish the survival regardless of most established prognostic factors (number and size of CRLM, surgical margin, extrahepatic metastases, CEA, and CA19‐9 levels, etc.). Integrating LDH into the Fong score contributed to an improvement in the predictive value. Conclusion Our study implicates serum LDH as a reliable and independent laboratory biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of curative‐intent surgery for CRLM. Composite of LDH and Fong score is a potential stratification tool for CRLM resection. Prospective, international studies are needed to validate these results across diverse populations.Long BaiZe‐Yu LinYun‐Xin LuQin ChenHan ZhouQi MengChun‐Ping LinWan‐Lan HuangYun‐Le WanZhi‐Zhong PanDe‐Shen WangWileyarticlecirculating biomarkercolorectal liver metastases (CRLM)hepatectomylactate dehydrogenase (LDH)Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancer Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 22, Pp 8005-8019 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic circulating biomarker
colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)
hepatectomy
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle circulating biomarker
colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)
hepatectomy
lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Long Bai
Ze‐Yu Lin
Yun‐Xin Lu
Qin Chen
Han Zhou
Qi Meng
Chun‐Ping Lin
Wan‐Lan Huang
Yun‐Le Wan
Zhi‐Zhong Pan
De‐Shen Wang
The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
description Abstract Background The prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in colorectal cancer patients has remained inconsistent between nonmetastatic and metastatic settings. So far, very few studies have included LDH in the prognostic analysis of curative‐intent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Patients and Methods Five hundred and eighty consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative‐intent CRLM resection from Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center (434 patients) and Sun Yat‐sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital (146 patients) in 2000–2019 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Cox regression model was performed to identify the prognostic values of preoperative serum LDH levels and other clinicopathology variables. A modification of the established Fong CRS scoring system comprising LDH was developed within this Chinese population. Results At the median follow‐up time of 60.5 months, median OS was 59.5 months in the pooled cohort. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative LDH >upper limit of normal (250 U/L) was the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.44; p < 0.001). Patients with elevated LDH levels showed impaired OS than patients with normal LDH levels (27.6 months vs. 68.8 months). Five‐year survival rates were 53.7% and 22.5% in the LDH‐normal group and LDH‐high group, respectively. Similar results were also confirmed in each cohort. In the subgroup analysis, LDH could distinguish the survival regardless of most established prognostic factors (number and size of CRLM, surgical margin, extrahepatic metastases, CEA, and CA19‐9 levels, etc.). Integrating LDH into the Fong score contributed to an improvement in the predictive value. Conclusion Our study implicates serum LDH as a reliable and independent laboratory biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of curative‐intent surgery for CRLM. Composite of LDH and Fong score is a potential stratification tool for CRLM resection. Prospective, international studies are needed to validate these results across diverse populations.
format article
author Long Bai
Ze‐Yu Lin
Yun‐Xin Lu
Qin Chen
Han Zhou
Qi Meng
Chun‐Ping Lin
Wan‐Lan Huang
Yun‐Le Wan
Zhi‐Zhong Pan
De‐Shen Wang
author_facet Long Bai
Ze‐Yu Lin
Yun‐Xin Lu
Qin Chen
Han Zhou
Qi Meng
Chun‐Ping Lin
Wan‐Lan Huang
Yun‐Le Wan
Zhi‐Zhong Pan
De‐Shen Wang
author_sort Long Bai
title The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
title_short The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
title_full The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
title_fullStr The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A two‐center cohort study
title_sort prognostic value of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase levels in patients underwent curative‐intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a two‐center cohort study
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/379bb3dd7c62469a931ce8bb0e4b0198
work_keys_str_mv AT longbai theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT zeyulin theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT yunxinlu theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT qinchen theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT hanzhou theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT qimeng theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT chunpinglin theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT wanlanhuang theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT yunlewan theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT zhizhongpan theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT deshenwang theprognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT longbai prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT zeyulin prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT yunxinlu prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT qinchen prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT hanzhou prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT qimeng prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT chunpinglin prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT wanlanhuang prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT yunlewan prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT zhizhongpan prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
AT deshenwang prognosticvalueofpreoperativeserumlactatedehydrogenaselevelsinpatientsunderwentcurativeintenthepatectomyforcolorectallivermetastasesatwocentercohortstudy
_version_ 1718417786865188864