Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort

Abstract Food additives (e.g. artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers, dyes, etc.) are ingested by billions of individuals daily. Some concerning results, mainly derived from animal and/or cell-based experimental studies, have recently emerged suggesting potential detrimental effects of several widely co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eloi Chazelas, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaesse, Alexandre De Sa, Rebecca Lutchia, Pauline Rebouillat, Bernard Srour, Charlotte Debras, Gaëlle Wendeu-Foyet, Inge Huybrechts, Fabrice Pierre, Xavier Coumoul, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Benjamin Allès, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Mathilde Touvier
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/37e61ff3f21e4345a36e9091a4057aa4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:37e61ff3f21e4345a36e9091a4057aa4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:37e61ff3f21e4345a36e9091a4057aa42021-12-02T18:09:03ZExposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort10.1038/s41598-021-98496-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/37e61ff3f21e4345a36e9091a4057aa42021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98496-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Food additives (e.g. artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers, dyes, etc.) are ingested by billions of individuals daily. Some concerning results, mainly derived from animal and/or cell-based experimental studies, have recently emerged suggesting potential detrimental effects of several widely consumed additives. Profiles of additive exposure as well as the potential long-term impact of multiple exposure on human health are poorly documented. This work aimed to estimate the usual intake of food additives among participants of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort and to identify and describe profiles of exposure (single substances and mixtures). Overall, 106,489 adults from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort study (2009-ongoing) were included. Consumption of 90 main food additives was evaluated using repeated 24 h dietary records including information on brands of commercial products. Qualitative information (as presence/absence) of each additive in food products was determined using 3 large-scale composition databases (OQALI, Open Food Facts, GNPD), accounting for the date of consumption of the product. Quantitative ingested doses were estimated using a combination of laboratory assays on food matrixes (n = 2677) and data from EFSA and JECFA. Exposure was estimated in mg per kg of body weight per day. Profiles of exposure to food additive mixtures were extracted using Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) followed by k-means clustering as well as Graphical Lasso. Sociodemographic and dietary comparison of clusters of participants was performed by Chi-square tests or linear regressions. Data were weighted according to the national census. Forty-eight additives were consumed by more than 10% of the participants, with modified starches and citric acid consumed by more than 90%. The top 50 also included several food additives for which potential adverse health effects have been suggested by recent experimental studies: lecithins (86.6% consumers), mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (78.1%), carrageenan (77.5%), sodium nitrite (73.9%), di-, tri- and polyphosphates (70.1%), potassium sorbate (65.8%), potassium metabisulphite (44.8%), acesulfame K (34.0%), cochineal (33.9%), potassium nitrate (31.6%), sulfite ammonia caramel (28.8%), bixin (19.5%), monosodium glutamate (15.1%) and sucralose (13.5%). We identified and described five clusters of participants more specifically exposed to five distinct additive mixtures and one additional cluster gathering participants with overall low additive exposure. Food additives, including several for which health concerns are currently debated, were widely consumed in this population-based study. Furthermore, main mixtures of additives were identified. Their health impact and potential cocktail effects should be explored in future epidemiological and experimental studies.Eloi ChazelasNathalie Druesne-PecolloYounes EsseddikFabien Szabo de EdelenyiCédric AgaesseAlexandre De SaRebecca LutchiaPauline RebouillatBernard SrourCharlotte DebrasGaëlle Wendeu-FoyetInge HuybrechtsFabrice PierreXavier CoumoulChantal JuliaEmmanuelle Kesse-GuyotBenjamin AllèsPilar GalanSerge HercbergMélanie Deschasaux-TanguyMathilde TouvierNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-21 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Eloi Chazelas
Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo
Younes Esseddik
Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi
Cédric Agaesse
Alexandre De Sa
Rebecca Lutchia
Pauline Rebouillat
Bernard Srour
Charlotte Debras
Gaëlle Wendeu-Foyet
Inge Huybrechts
Fabrice Pierre
Xavier Coumoul
Chantal Julia
Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
Benjamin Allès
Pilar Galan
Serge Hercberg
Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy
Mathilde Touvier
Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
description Abstract Food additives (e.g. artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers, dyes, etc.) are ingested by billions of individuals daily. Some concerning results, mainly derived from animal and/or cell-based experimental studies, have recently emerged suggesting potential detrimental effects of several widely consumed additives. Profiles of additive exposure as well as the potential long-term impact of multiple exposure on human health are poorly documented. This work aimed to estimate the usual intake of food additives among participants of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort and to identify and describe profiles of exposure (single substances and mixtures). Overall, 106,489 adults from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort study (2009-ongoing) were included. Consumption of 90 main food additives was evaluated using repeated 24 h dietary records including information on brands of commercial products. Qualitative information (as presence/absence) of each additive in food products was determined using 3 large-scale composition databases (OQALI, Open Food Facts, GNPD), accounting for the date of consumption of the product. Quantitative ingested doses were estimated using a combination of laboratory assays on food matrixes (n = 2677) and data from EFSA and JECFA. Exposure was estimated in mg per kg of body weight per day. Profiles of exposure to food additive mixtures were extracted using Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) followed by k-means clustering as well as Graphical Lasso. Sociodemographic and dietary comparison of clusters of participants was performed by Chi-square tests or linear regressions. Data were weighted according to the national census. Forty-eight additives were consumed by more than 10% of the participants, with modified starches and citric acid consumed by more than 90%. The top 50 also included several food additives for which potential adverse health effects have been suggested by recent experimental studies: lecithins (86.6% consumers), mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids (78.1%), carrageenan (77.5%), sodium nitrite (73.9%), di-, tri- and polyphosphates (70.1%), potassium sorbate (65.8%), potassium metabisulphite (44.8%), acesulfame K (34.0%), cochineal (33.9%), potassium nitrate (31.6%), sulfite ammonia caramel (28.8%), bixin (19.5%), monosodium glutamate (15.1%) and sucralose (13.5%). We identified and described five clusters of participants more specifically exposed to five distinct additive mixtures and one additional cluster gathering participants with overall low additive exposure. Food additives, including several for which health concerns are currently debated, were widely consumed in this population-based study. Furthermore, main mixtures of additives were identified. Their health impact and potential cocktail effects should be explored in future epidemiological and experimental studies.
format article
author Eloi Chazelas
Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo
Younes Esseddik
Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi
Cédric Agaesse
Alexandre De Sa
Rebecca Lutchia
Pauline Rebouillat
Bernard Srour
Charlotte Debras
Gaëlle Wendeu-Foyet
Inge Huybrechts
Fabrice Pierre
Xavier Coumoul
Chantal Julia
Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
Benjamin Allès
Pilar Galan
Serge Hercberg
Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy
Mathilde Touvier
author_facet Eloi Chazelas
Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo
Younes Esseddik
Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi
Cédric Agaesse
Alexandre De Sa
Rebecca Lutchia
Pauline Rebouillat
Bernard Srour
Charlotte Debras
Gaëlle Wendeu-Foyet
Inge Huybrechts
Fabrice Pierre
Xavier Coumoul
Chantal Julia
Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot
Benjamin Allès
Pilar Galan
Serge Hercberg
Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy
Mathilde Touvier
author_sort Eloi Chazelas
title Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
title_short Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
title_full Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
title_fullStr Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
title_full_unstemmed Exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 French adults from the NutriNet-Santé cohort
title_sort exposure to food additive mixtures in 106,000 french adults from the nutrinet-santé cohort
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/37e61ff3f21e4345a36e9091a4057aa4
work_keys_str_mv AT eloichazelas exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT nathaliedruesnepecollo exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT younesesseddik exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT fabienszabodeedelenyi exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT cedricagaesse exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT alexandredesa exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT rebeccalutchia exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT paulinerebouillat exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT bernardsrour exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT charlottedebras exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT gaellewendeufoyet exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT ingehuybrechts exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT fabricepierre exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT xaviercoumoul exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT chantaljulia exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT emmanuellekesseguyot exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT benjaminalles exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT pilargalan exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT sergehercberg exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT melaniedeschasauxtanguy exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
AT mathildetouvier exposuretofoodadditivemixturesin106000frenchadultsfromthenutrinetsantecohort
_version_ 1718378620026617856