Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.

<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidel...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Katsushi Takeshita, Masahiko Sumitani, Yasushi Oshima, Juichi Tonosu, So Kato, Junichi Ohya, Takeshi Oichi, Naoki Okamoto, Sakae Tanaka
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/37e8d4110372465c9c2ca37892fa4467
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:37e8d4110372465c9c2ca37892fa4467
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:37e8d4110372465c9c2ca37892fa44672021-11-18T08:53:04ZValidity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0068013https://doaj.org/article/37e8d4110372465c9c2ca37892fa44672013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24098629/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidelines. Subsequently, a multicenter observational study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PDQ-J, including 113 Japanese patients suffering from pain.<h4>Results</h4>Factor analysis revealed that the main component of PDQ-J comprises two determinative factors, which account for 62% of the variance observed. Moreover, PDQ-J revealed statistically significant correlation with the intensity of pain (Numerical Rating Scale), Physical Component Score, and Mental Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Cronbach alpha for the total score was 0.78 and for the main component was 0.80. In the analysis of test-retest method, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.94.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We demonstrated the validity and reliability of PDQ-J. We encourage researchers and clinicians to use this tool for the assessment of patients who suffer suspected neuropathic pain.Yoshitaka MatsubayashiKatsushi TakeshitaMasahiko SumitaniYasushi OshimaJuichi TonosuSo KatoJunichi OhyaTakeshi OichiNaoki OkamotoSakae TanakaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e68013 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Yoshitaka Matsubayashi Katsushi Takeshita Masahiko Sumitani Yasushi Oshima Juichi Tonosu So Kato Junichi Ohya Takeshi Oichi Naoki Okamoto Sakae Tanaka Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
description	<h4>Objectives</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>The translation of the original PDQ into Japanese was achieved according to the published guidelines. Subsequently, a multicenter observational study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of PDQ-J, including 113 Japanese patients suffering from pain.<h4>Results</h4>Factor analysis revealed that the main component of PDQ-J comprises two determinative factors, which account for 62% of the variance observed. Moreover, PDQ-J revealed statistically significant correlation with the intensity of pain (Numerical Rating Scale), Physical Component Score, and Mental Component Score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Cronbach alpha for the total score was 0.78 and for the main component was 0.80. In the analysis of test-retest method, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the two scores was 0.94.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We demonstrated the validity and reliability of PDQ-J. We encourage researchers and clinicians to use this tool for the assessment of patients who suffer suspected neuropathic pain.
format	article
author	Yoshitaka Matsubayashi Katsushi Takeshita Masahiko Sumitani Yasushi Oshima Juichi Tonosu So Kato Junichi Ohya Takeshi Oichi Naoki Okamoto Sakae Tanaka
author_facet	Yoshitaka Matsubayashi Katsushi Takeshita Masahiko Sumitani Yasushi Oshima Juichi Tonosu So Kato Junichi Ohya Takeshi Oichi Naoki Okamoto Sakae Tanaka
author_sort	Yoshitaka Matsubayashi
title	Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
title_short	Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
title_full	Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
title_fullStr	Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
title_full_unstemmed	Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
title_sort	validity and reliability of the japanese version of the paindetect questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/37e8d4110372465c9c2ca37892fa4467
work_keys_str_mv	AT yoshitakamatsubayashi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT katsushitakeshita validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT masahikosumitani validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT yasushioshima validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT juichitonosu validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT sokato validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT junichiohya validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT takeshioichi validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT naokiokamoto validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy AT sakaetanaka validityandreliabilityofthejapaneseversionofthepaindetectquestionnaireamulticenterobservationalstudy
_version_	1718421194385915904

Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the painDETECT questionnaire: a multicenter observational study.

Ejemplares similares