Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students

Abstract Background College students are leading an evolution of device use both in the type of device and the frequency of use. They have transitioned from desktop stations to laptops, tablets, and especially smartphones and use them throughout the day and into the night. Methods Using a 35-min onl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark Benden, Ranjana Mehta, Adam Pickens, Brett Harp, Matthew Lee Smith, Samuel D. Towne, S. Camille Peres
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3810f4a272c243be86fa078d5ec17d19
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3810f4a272c243be86fa078d5ec17d19
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3810f4a272c243be86fa078d5ec17d192021-11-08T10:44:13ZHealth-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students10.1186/s12889-021-11975-31471-2458https://doaj.org/article/3810f4a272c243be86fa078d5ec17d192021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11975-3https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458Abstract Background College students are leading an evolution of device use both in the type of device and the frequency of use. They have transitioned from desktop stations to laptops, tablets, and especially smartphones and use them throughout the day and into the night. Methods Using a 35-min online survey, we sought to understand how technology daily usage patterns, device types, and postures affect pain and discomfort to understand how knowledge of that pain might help students avoid it. Data were analyzed from 515 students (69.5% male) who completed an internet-delivered survey (81.3% response rate). Results Participants ranked smartphones as their most frequently used technology (64.0%), followed by laptops and tablets (both 53.2%), and desktop computers (46.4%). Time spent using smartphones averaged over 4.4 h per day. When using their devices, students were more likely to adopt non-traditional workplace postures as they used these devices primarily on the couch or at a chair with no desk. Conclusion Recent trends in wireless academic access points along with the portability of small handheld devices, have made smartphones the most common link to educational materials despite having the least favorable control and display scenario from an ergonomic perspective. Further, the potential impact of transitions in work environments due to COVID-19 may further exacerbate ergonomic issues among millions highlighting the need for such work to be carried out.Mark BendenRanjana MehtaAdam PickensBrett HarpMatthew Lee SmithSamuel D. TowneS. Camille PeresBMCarticleStudentErgonomicsPostureComfortSedentarySmartphonePublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENBMC Public Health, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Student
Ergonomics
Posture
Comfort
Sedentary
Smartphone
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Student
Ergonomics
Posture
Comfort
Sedentary
Smartphone
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Mark Benden
Ranjana Mehta
Adam Pickens
Brett Harp
Matthew Lee Smith
Samuel D. Towne
S. Camille Peres
Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
description Abstract Background College students are leading an evolution of device use both in the type of device and the frequency of use. They have transitioned from desktop stations to laptops, tablets, and especially smartphones and use them throughout the day and into the night. Methods Using a 35-min online survey, we sought to understand how technology daily usage patterns, device types, and postures affect pain and discomfort to understand how knowledge of that pain might help students avoid it. Data were analyzed from 515 students (69.5% male) who completed an internet-delivered survey (81.3% response rate). Results Participants ranked smartphones as their most frequently used technology (64.0%), followed by laptops and tablets (both 53.2%), and desktop computers (46.4%). Time spent using smartphones averaged over 4.4 h per day. When using their devices, students were more likely to adopt non-traditional workplace postures as they used these devices primarily on the couch or at a chair with no desk. Conclusion Recent trends in wireless academic access points along with the portability of small handheld devices, have made smartphones the most common link to educational materials despite having the least favorable control and display scenario from an ergonomic perspective. Further, the potential impact of transitions in work environments due to COVID-19 may further exacerbate ergonomic issues among millions highlighting the need for such work to be carried out.
format article
author Mark Benden
Ranjana Mehta
Adam Pickens
Brett Harp
Matthew Lee Smith
Samuel D. Towne
S. Camille Peres
author_facet Mark Benden
Ranjana Mehta
Adam Pickens
Brett Harp
Matthew Lee Smith
Samuel D. Towne
S. Camille Peres
author_sort Mark Benden
title Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
title_short Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
title_full Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
title_fullStr Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
title_full_unstemmed Health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
title_sort health-related consequences of the type and utilization rates of electronic devices by college students
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3810f4a272c243be86fa078d5ec17d19
work_keys_str_mv AT markbenden healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT ranjanamehta healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT adampickens healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT brettharp healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT matthewleesmith healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT samueldtowne healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
AT scamilleperes healthrelatedconsequencesofthetypeandutilizationratesofelectronicdevicesbycollegestudents
_version_ 1718442701735591936