Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area

Abstract The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), one of the world’s largest marine protected areas, represents 11% of the exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Kiribati, which earns much of its GDP by selling tuna fishing licenses to foreign nations. We have determined that PIPA is a spawnin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christina M. Hernández, Jan Witting, Ciara Willis, Simon R. Thorrold, Joel K. Llopiz, Randi D. Rotjan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3845851fee154588b539ef139ff808cd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3845851fee154588b539ef139ff808cd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3845851fee154588b539ef139ff808cd2021-12-02T15:08:20ZEvidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area10.1038/s41598-019-47161-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3845851fee154588b539ef139ff808cd2019-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47161-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), one of the world’s largest marine protected areas, represents 11% of the exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Kiribati, which earns much of its GDP by selling tuna fishing licenses to foreign nations. We have determined that PIPA is a spawning area for skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), bigeye (Thunnus obesus), and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tunas. Our approach included sampling larvae on cruises in 2015–2017 and using a biological-physical model to estimate spawning locations for collected larvae. Temperature and chlorophyll conditions varied markedly due to observed ENSO states: El Niño (2015) and neutral (2016–2017). However, larval tuna distributions were similar amongst years. Generally, skipjack larvae were patchy and more abundant near PIPA’s northeast corner, while Thunnus larvae exhibited lower and more even abundances. Genetic barcoding confirmed the presence of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna larvae. Model simulations indicated that most of the larvae collected inside PIPA in 2015 were spawned inside, while stronger currents in 2016 moved more larvae across PIPA’s boundaries. Larval distributions and relative spawning output simulations indicated that both focal taxa spawned inside PIPA in all 3 study years, demonstrating that PIPA is protecting viable tuna spawning habitat.Christina M. HernándezJan WittingCiara WillisSimon R. ThorroldJoel K. LlopizRandi D. RotjanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Christina M. Hernández
Jan Witting
Ciara Willis
Simon R. Thorrold
Joel K. Llopiz
Randi D. Rotjan
Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
description Abstract The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), one of the world’s largest marine protected areas, represents 11% of the exclusive economic zone of the Republic of Kiribati, which earns much of its GDP by selling tuna fishing licenses to foreign nations. We have determined that PIPA is a spawning area for skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), bigeye (Thunnus obesus), and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tunas. Our approach included sampling larvae on cruises in 2015–2017 and using a biological-physical model to estimate spawning locations for collected larvae. Temperature and chlorophyll conditions varied markedly due to observed ENSO states: El Niño (2015) and neutral (2016–2017). However, larval tuna distributions were similar amongst years. Generally, skipjack larvae were patchy and more abundant near PIPA’s northeast corner, while Thunnus larvae exhibited lower and more even abundances. Genetic barcoding confirmed the presence of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna larvae. Model simulations indicated that most of the larvae collected inside PIPA in 2015 were spawned inside, while stronger currents in 2016 moved more larvae across PIPA’s boundaries. Larval distributions and relative spawning output simulations indicated that both focal taxa spawned inside PIPA in all 3 study years, demonstrating that PIPA is protecting viable tuna spawning habitat.
format article
author Christina M. Hernández
Jan Witting
Ciara Willis
Simon R. Thorrold
Joel K. Llopiz
Randi D. Rotjan
author_facet Christina M. Hernández
Jan Witting
Ciara Willis
Simon R. Thorrold
Joel K. Llopiz
Randi D. Rotjan
author_sort Christina M. Hernández
title Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
title_short Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
title_full Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
title_fullStr Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
title_full_unstemmed Evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take Marine Protected Area
title_sort evidence and patterns of tuna spawning inside a large no-take marine protected area
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/3845851fee154588b539ef139ff808cd
work_keys_str_mv AT christinamhernandez evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
AT janwitting evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
AT ciarawillis evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
AT simonrthorrold evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
AT joelkllopiz evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
AT randidrotjan evidenceandpatternsoftunaspawninginsidealargenotakemarineprotectedarea
_version_ 1718388179154763776