Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values

Abstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christopher G. Schwarz, Nirubol Tosakulwong, Matthew L. Senjem, Jeffrey L. Gunter, Terry M. Therneau, Prashanthi Vemuri, Val J. Lowe, Clifford R. Jack
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b52021-12-02T11:40:54ZConsiderations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values10.1038/s41598-018-25459-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b52018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25459-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales to match those from a standard Centiloid unit scale. Our group’s measurement method differs from the Centiloid’s standard method in both acquisition and analysis methods. In this work we examine multiple variations for performing these transformations and compare several approaches. We hypothesized that using Deming regression, which accounts for error on both axes, would produce a more optimal transformation than the recommended standard linear regression. We also examined the effects of performing separate regressions for differences in acquisition and analysis methods, rather than a direct single-regression approach. Our results found that all transformation approaches had very similar performance and were within the recommended tolerance thresholds.Christopher G. SchwarzNirubol TosakulwongMatthew L. SenjemJeffrey L. GunterTerry M. TherneauPrashanthi VemuriVal J. LoweClifford R. JackNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
description Abstract The Centiloid Project describes a post-hoc data transformation to standardize amyloid PET measurements to enable direct data comparisons across sites and studies using differing acquisition/analysis methods. It uses linear regression that transforms values using different measurement scales to match those from a standard Centiloid unit scale. Our group’s measurement method differs from the Centiloid’s standard method in both acquisition and analysis methods. In this work we examine multiple variations for performing these transformations and compare several approaches. We hypothesized that using Deming regression, which accounts for error on both axes, would produce a more optimal transformation than the recommended standard linear regression. We also examined the effects of performing separate regressions for differences in acquisition and analysis methods, rather than a direct single-regression approach. Our results found that all transformation approaches had very similar performance and were within the recommended tolerance thresholds.
format article
author Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
author_facet Christopher G. Schwarz
Nirubol Tosakulwong
Matthew L. Senjem
Jeffrey L. Gunter
Terry M. Therneau
Prashanthi Vemuri
Val J. Lowe
Clifford R. Jack
author_sort Christopher G. Schwarz
title Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_short Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_full Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_fullStr Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for Performing Level-2 Centiloid Transformations for Amyloid PET SUVR values
title_sort considerations for performing level-2 centiloid transformations for amyloid pet suvr values
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/384c32a4458e4957a1125b51825a85b5
work_keys_str_mv AT christophergschwarz considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT niruboltosakulwong considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT matthewlsenjem considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT jeffreylgunter considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT terrymtherneau considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT prashanthivemuri considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT valjlowe considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
AT cliffordrjack considerationsforperforminglevel2centiloidtransformationsforamyloidpetsuvrvalues
_version_ 1718395511488118784