Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.

<h4>Background</h4>Few studies have examined the best way to convey the probability of serious events occurring in the future (i.e., risk of stroke or death) to persons with low numeracy or graph literacy proficiency. To address this gap, we developed and user-tested a bar graph and comp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peter Scalia, Danielle C Schubbe, Emily S Lu, Marie-Anne Durand, Jorge Frascara, Guillermina Noel, A James O'Malley, Glyn Elwyn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3880765a05184559842a911c7b467486
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3880765a05184559842a911c7b467486
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3880765a05184559842a911c7b4674862021-12-02T20:04:55ZComparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253644https://doaj.org/article/3880765a05184559842a911c7b4674862021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253644https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Few studies have examined the best way to convey the probability of serious events occurring in the future (i.e., risk of stroke or death) to persons with low numeracy or graph literacy proficiency. To address this gap, we developed and user-tested a bar graph and compared it to icon arrays to assess its impact on understanding and preference for viewing risk information.<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the: (i) formats' impact on participants' understanding of risk information; (ii) formats' impact on understanding and format preference across numeracy and graph literacy subgroups; (iii) rationale supporting participants' preference for each graphical display format.<h4>Methods</h4>An online sample (evenly made up of participants with high and low objective numeracy and graph literacy) was randomized to view either the icon array or the bar graph. Each format conveyed the risk of major stroke and death five years after choosing surgery, a stent, or medication to treat carotid artery stenosis. Participants answered questions to assess their understanding of the risk information. Lastly, both formats were presented in parallel, and participants were asked to identify their preferred format to view risk information and explain their preference.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 407 participants, 197 were assigned the icon array and 210 the bar graph. Understanding of risk information and format preference did not differ significantly between the two trial arms, irrespective of numeracy and graph literacy proficiency. High numeracy and graph literacy proficiency was associated with high understanding (p<0.01) and a preference for the bar graph (p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>We found no evidence to demonstrate the superiority of one format over another on understanding. The majority of participants preferred viewing the risk information using the bar graph format.Peter ScaliaDanielle C SchubbeEmily S LuMarie-Anne DurandJorge FrascaraGuillermina NoelA James O'MalleyGlyn ElwynPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0253644 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Peter Scalia
Danielle C Schubbe
Emily S Lu
Marie-Anne Durand
Jorge Frascara
Guillermina Noel
A James O'Malley
Glyn Elwyn
Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
description <h4>Background</h4>Few studies have examined the best way to convey the probability of serious events occurring in the future (i.e., risk of stroke or death) to persons with low numeracy or graph literacy proficiency. To address this gap, we developed and user-tested a bar graph and compared it to icon arrays to assess its impact on understanding and preference for viewing risk information.<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine the: (i) formats' impact on participants' understanding of risk information; (ii) formats' impact on understanding and format preference across numeracy and graph literacy subgroups; (iii) rationale supporting participants' preference for each graphical display format.<h4>Methods</h4>An online sample (evenly made up of participants with high and low objective numeracy and graph literacy) was randomized to view either the icon array or the bar graph. Each format conveyed the risk of major stroke and death five years after choosing surgery, a stent, or medication to treat carotid artery stenosis. Participants answered questions to assess their understanding of the risk information. Lastly, both formats were presented in parallel, and participants were asked to identify their preferred format to view risk information and explain their preference.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 407 participants, 197 were assigned the icon array and 210 the bar graph. Understanding of risk information and format preference did not differ significantly between the two trial arms, irrespective of numeracy and graph literacy proficiency. High numeracy and graph literacy proficiency was associated with high understanding (p<0.01) and a preference for the bar graph (p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>We found no evidence to demonstrate the superiority of one format over another on understanding. The majority of participants preferred viewing the risk information using the bar graph format.
format article
author Peter Scalia
Danielle C Schubbe
Emily S Lu
Marie-Anne Durand
Jorge Frascara
Guillermina Noel
A James O'Malley
Glyn Elwyn
author_facet Peter Scalia
Danielle C Schubbe
Emily S Lu
Marie-Anne Durand
Jorge Frascara
Guillermina Noel
A James O'Malley
Glyn Elwyn
author_sort Peter Scalia
title Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
title_short Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
title_full Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
title_fullStr Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: Results from an online, randomized study.
title_sort comparing the impact of an icon array versus a bar graph on preference and understanding of risk information: results from an online, randomized study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3880765a05184559842a911c7b467486
work_keys_str_mv AT peterscalia comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT daniellecschubbe comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT emilyslu comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT marieannedurand comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT jorgefrascara comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT guillerminanoel comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT ajamesomalley comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
AT glynelwyn comparingtheimpactofaniconarrayversusabargraphonpreferenceandunderstandingofriskinformationresultsfromanonlinerandomizedstudy
_version_ 1718375533899677696