A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion

This retrospective controlled clinical study aimed to verify if intensive neurorehabilitation (INR) could improve ambulation faster than spontaneous recovery or conventional physiotherapy and provide a possible therapeutic approach in post-surgical paraplegic deep pain perception-positive (DPP<su...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ângela Martins, Débora Gouveia, Ana Cardoso, Carla Carvalho, Tiago Coelho, Cátia Silva, Inês Viegas, Óscar Gamboa, António Ferreira
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/38c1ba8951184577ac214abd73478f11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:38c1ba8951184577ac214abd73478f11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:38c1ba8951184577ac214abd73478f112021-11-25T16:13:57ZA Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion10.3390/ani111130342076-2615https://doaj.org/article/38c1ba8951184577ac214abd73478f112021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/11/3034https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615This retrospective controlled clinical study aimed to verify if intensive neurorehabilitation (INR) could improve ambulation faster than spontaneous recovery or conventional physiotherapy and provide a possible therapeutic approach in post-surgical paraplegic deep pain perception-positive (DPP<sup>+</sup>) (with absent/decreased flexor reflex) and DPP-negative (DDP<sup>−</sup>) dogs, with acute intervertebral disc extrusion. A large cohort of T10-L3 Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) dogs (<i>n</i> = 367) were divided into a study group (SG) (<i>n</i> = 262) and a control group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 105). The SG was based on prospective clinical cases, and the CG was created by retrospective medical records. All SG dogs performed an INR protocol by the hospitalization regime based on locomotor training, electrical stimulation, and, for DPP<sup>−</sup>, a combination with pharmacological management. All were monitored throughout the process, and measuring the outcome for DPP<sup>+</sup> was performed by OFS and, for the DPP<sup>−</sup>, by the new Functional Neurorehabilitation Scale (FNRS-DPP<sup>−</sup>). In the SG, DPP<sup>+</sup> dogs had an ambulation rate of 99.4% (<i>n</i> = 167) and, in DPP<sup>−</sup>, of 58.5% (<i>n</i> = 55). Moreover, in DPP<sup>+</sup>, there was a strong statistically significant difference between groups regarding ambulation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The same significant difference was verified in the DPP<sup>–</sup> dogs (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Furthermore, a tendency toward a significant statistical difference (<i>p</i> = 0.058) regarding DPP recovery was demonstrated between groups. Of the 59 dogs that did not recover DPP, 22 dogs achieved spinal reflex locomotion (SRL), 37.2% within a maximum of 3 months. The progressive myelomalacia cases were 14.9% (14/94). Therefore, although it is difficult to assess the contribution of INR for recovery, the results suggested that ambulation success may be improved, mainly regarding time.Ângela MartinsDébora GouveiaAna CardosoCarla CarvalhoTiago CoelhoCátia SilvaInês ViegasÓscar GamboaAntónio FerreiraMDPI AGarticlespinal cord injurylocomotor trainingfunctional electrical stimulationtranscutaneous electrical SC stimulation4-aminopyridineneurorehabilitationVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ZoologyQL1-991ENAnimals, Vol 11, Iss 3034, p 3034 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic spinal cord injury
locomotor training
functional electrical stimulation
transcutaneous electrical SC stimulation
4-aminopyridine
neurorehabilitation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
spellingShingle spinal cord injury
locomotor training
functional electrical stimulation
transcutaneous electrical SC stimulation
4-aminopyridine
neurorehabilitation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
Ângela Martins
Débora Gouveia
Ana Cardoso
Carla Carvalho
Tiago Coelho
Cátia Silva
Inês Viegas
Óscar Gamboa
António Ferreira
A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
description This retrospective controlled clinical study aimed to verify if intensive neurorehabilitation (INR) could improve ambulation faster than spontaneous recovery or conventional physiotherapy and provide a possible therapeutic approach in post-surgical paraplegic deep pain perception-positive (DPP<sup>+</sup>) (with absent/decreased flexor reflex) and DPP-negative (DDP<sup>−</sup>) dogs, with acute intervertebral disc extrusion. A large cohort of T10-L3 Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) dogs (<i>n</i> = 367) were divided into a study group (SG) (<i>n</i> = 262) and a control group (CG) (<i>n</i> = 105). The SG was based on prospective clinical cases, and the CG was created by retrospective medical records. All SG dogs performed an INR protocol by the hospitalization regime based on locomotor training, electrical stimulation, and, for DPP<sup>−</sup>, a combination with pharmacological management. All were monitored throughout the process, and measuring the outcome for DPP<sup>+</sup> was performed by OFS and, for the DPP<sup>−</sup>, by the new Functional Neurorehabilitation Scale (FNRS-DPP<sup>−</sup>). In the SG, DPP<sup>+</sup> dogs had an ambulation rate of 99.4% (<i>n</i> = 167) and, in DPP<sup>−</sup>, of 58.5% (<i>n</i> = 55). Moreover, in DPP<sup>+</sup>, there was a strong statistically significant difference between groups regarding ambulation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The same significant difference was verified in the DPP<sup>–</sup> dogs (<i>p</i> = 0.007). Furthermore, a tendency toward a significant statistical difference (<i>p</i> = 0.058) regarding DPP recovery was demonstrated between groups. Of the 59 dogs that did not recover DPP, 22 dogs achieved spinal reflex locomotion (SRL), 37.2% within a maximum of 3 months. The progressive myelomalacia cases were 14.9% (14/94). Therefore, although it is difficult to assess the contribution of INR for recovery, the results suggested that ambulation success may be improved, mainly regarding time.
format article
author Ângela Martins
Débora Gouveia
Ana Cardoso
Carla Carvalho
Tiago Coelho
Cátia Silva
Inês Viegas
Óscar Gamboa
António Ferreira
author_facet Ângela Martins
Débora Gouveia
Ana Cardoso
Carla Carvalho
Tiago Coelho
Cátia Silva
Inês Viegas
Óscar Gamboa
António Ferreira
author_sort Ângela Martins
title A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
title_short A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
title_full A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
title_fullStr A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
title_full_unstemmed A Controlled Clinical Study of Intensive Neurorehabilitation in Post-Surgical Dogs with Severe Acute Intervertebral Disc Extrusion
title_sort controlled clinical study of intensive neurorehabilitation in post-surgical dogs with severe acute intervertebral disc extrusion
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/38c1ba8951184577ac214abd73478f11
work_keys_str_mv AT angelamartins acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT deboragouveia acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT anacardoso acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT carlacarvalho acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT tiagocoelho acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT catiasilva acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT inesviegas acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT oscargamboa acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT antonioferreira acontrolledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT angelamartins controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT deboragouveia controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT anacardoso controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT carlacarvalho controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT tiagocoelho controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT catiasilva controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT inesviegas controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT oscargamboa controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
AT antonioferreira controlledclinicalstudyofintensiveneurorehabilitationinpostsurgicaldogswithsevereacuteintervertebraldiscextrusion
_version_ 1718413249203929088