The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity

The present paper explores the connection between the topos of the four ages of humankind, and kr̥tayuga in particular, and the way in which Rāma’s rule is described in the Rāmāyaṇa. This topos, commonly found in various literatures of the ancient world, is also attested in this epic, featuring in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mariola Pigoniowa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/38ccf28a15de45cfab59003aae50c30a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:38ccf28a15de45cfab59003aae50c30a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:38ccf28a15de45cfab59003aae50c30a2021-11-27T12:53:14ZThe Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity10.12797/CIS.15.2013.15.111732-09172449-8696https://doaj.org/article/38ccf28a15de45cfab59003aae50c30a2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/cis/article/view/1552https://doaj.org/toc/1732-0917https://doaj.org/toc/2449-8696 The present paper explores the connection between the topos of the four ages of humankind, and kr̥tayuga in particular, and the way in which Rāma’s rule is described in the Rāmāyaṇa. This topos, commonly found in various literatures of the ancient world, is also attested in this epic, featuring in the account of Rāma’s rule in books one and six. The characteristic elements of kr̥tayuga, such as the earth’s spontaneous abundance and the absence of human miseries and suffering, make it clear that the king whose rule is described in such a way should be regarded as a divine human. The first part of this paper discusses the main problems connected with the Indian idea of king as presented especially by Edward W. Hopkins and Sheldon Pollock (king as a divine human or mortal god). The second part is devoted to the comparison of the descriptions of the world’s four periods in Indian, Greek, and Roman literature, with a focus on the similarities between them. In the third part of the paper emphasis is laid on the kr̥tayuga in particular and the way in which Rāma’s rule is described. Mariola PigoniowaKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleRāmāyaṇafour ages of humankind (yugas)Rāma’s divinityIndo-Iranian languages and literaturePK1-9601Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, OceaniaPL1-8844ENCracow Indological Studies, Vol 15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Rāmāyaṇa
four ages of humankind (yugas)
Rāma’s divinity
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
spellingShingle Rāmāyaṇa
four ages of humankind (yugas)
Rāma’s divinity
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
Mariola Pigoniowa
The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
description The present paper explores the connection between the topos of the four ages of humankind, and kr̥tayuga in particular, and the way in which Rāma’s rule is described in the Rāmāyaṇa. This topos, commonly found in various literatures of the ancient world, is also attested in this epic, featuring in the account of Rāma’s rule in books one and six. The characteristic elements of kr̥tayuga, such as the earth’s spontaneous abundance and the absence of human miseries and suffering, make it clear that the king whose rule is described in such a way should be regarded as a divine human. The first part of this paper discusses the main problems connected with the Indian idea of king as presented especially by Edward W. Hopkins and Sheldon Pollock (king as a divine human or mortal god). The second part is devoted to the comparison of the descriptions of the world’s four periods in Indian, Greek, and Roman literature, with a focus on the similarities between them. In the third part of the paper emphasis is laid on the kr̥tayuga in particular and the way in which Rāma’s rule is described.
format article
author Mariola Pigoniowa
author_facet Mariola Pigoniowa
author_sort Mariola Pigoniowa
title The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
title_short The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
title_full The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
title_fullStr The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
title_full_unstemmed The Topos of the Four Ages of Humankind and the Question of Rāma’s Divinity
title_sort topos of the four ages of humankind and the question of rāma’s divinity
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/38ccf28a15de45cfab59003aae50c30a
work_keys_str_mv AT mariolapigoniowa thetoposofthefouragesofhumankindandthequestionoframasdivinity
AT mariolapigoniowa toposofthefouragesofhumankindandthequestionoframasdivinity
_version_ 1718408978504876032