Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems?
Changing patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The variou...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f536 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f536 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f5362021-11-15T15:15:36ZAuthorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems?10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.8671935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f5362014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.867https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885Changing patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The various partners in these international collaborations are likely to produce research results that should gradually lead to stronger diversity in research output, including an increase in international co-authorship. When it comes to multinational co-authored publications, among sensitive questions that may complicate these relationships is the way different research systems deal with research integrity. It is well worth examining how to accommodate different cultural traditions and normative assumptions embedded in academic practices for collaborative research networks. Given the increasingly international and interdisciplinary nature of science and engineering, any guidelines for authorship practices in international collaborations must be clear about the variations that exist across disciplines and cultures, variations which will have an impact on accepted practices and expectations for collaboration. Collaborative endeavors in research will succeed only if a broader understanding of potential obstacles to these collaborations is reached.Sonia VasconcelosDaniel VasgirdIekuni IchikawaDena PlemmonsAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 155-158 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
description |
Changing patterns in collaborative research networks reflect a new geography of science that is increasingly shaped by interactions between established and emerging scientific powers, whose cultural and political diversity are now reflected in perhaps never before thought of interactions. The various partners in these international collaborations are likely to produce research results that should gradually lead to stronger diversity in research output, including an increase in international co-authorship. When it comes to multinational co-authored publications, among sensitive questions that may complicate these relationships is the way different research systems deal with research integrity. It is well worth examining how to accommodate different cultural traditions and normative assumptions embedded in academic practices for collaborative research networks. Given the increasingly international and interdisciplinary nature of science and engineering, any guidelines for authorship practices in international collaborations must be clear about the variations that exist across disciplines and cultures, variations which will have an impact on accepted practices and expectations for collaboration. Collaborative endeavors in research will succeed only if a broader understanding of potential obstacles to these collaborations is reached. |
format |
article |
author |
Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons |
author_facet |
Sonia Vasconcelos Daniel Vasgird Iekuni Ichikawa Dena Plemmons |
author_sort |
Sonia Vasconcelos |
title |
Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
title_short |
Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
title_full |
Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
title_fullStr |
Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authorship Guidelines and Actual Practice: Are They Harmonized in Different Research Systems? |
title_sort |
authorship guidelines and actual practice: are they harmonized in different research systems? |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/38def81ebe994574a1c9775472f0f536 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soniavasconcelos authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT danielvasgird authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT iekuniichikawa authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems AT denaplemmons authorshipguidelinesandactualpracticearetheyharmonizedindifferentresearchsystems |
_version_ |
1718428182801022976 |