Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector

The design, construction and investigation of experimental study of two compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs) with tubular absorber have been presented. The performance of CPCs have been evaluated by using outdoor experimental measurements including the instantaneous thermal efficiency. The two C...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qussai Jihad Abdul-Ghafour, Mohammed Aziz Hassan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/39214912013a41ec9a3fd652582d8bae
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:39214912013a41ec9a3fd652582d8bae
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:39214912013a41ec9a3fd652582d8bae2021-12-02T10:50:06ZExperimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector1818-11712312-0789https://doaj.org/article/39214912013a41ec9a3fd652582d8bae2016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://alkej.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/alkej/article/view/280https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171https://doaj.org/toc/2312-0789 The design, construction and investigation of experimental study of two compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs) with tubular absorber have been presented. The performance of CPCs have been evaluated by using outdoor experimental measurements including the instantaneous thermal efficiency. The two CPCs are tested instantly by holding them on a common structure. Many tests are conducted in the present work by truncating one of them in three different levels. For each truncation the acceptance half angle (θc) was changed. Geometrically, the acceptance half angle for standard CPC is (26o). For the truncation levels for the other CPC 1, 2 and 3 the acceptance half angle were 20o, 26o and 59o, consequently. A significant difference between the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 3.86× CPC (θc=20o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o), and between that for 3.61× CPC (θc=26o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o). It's noticed that the difference between the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 2.32× CPC (θc=59o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o) is small compared with the difference of the first and second cases, the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 2.32× CPC (26o) was higher than those for other three CPCs. The experimental results show that the maximum thermal efficiency of the full 2.32×CPC (26o) is 0.708, the maximum thermal efficiency of the 3.93×CPC (15o), when it's truncated to 3.84× CPC (20o), 3.61× CPC (26o) and 2.32× CPC (59o)  are 0.51, 0.52 and 0.66, respectively. As the concentration ratio decreases from (3.93× to 1×), the thermal efficiency, energy losses and optical efficiency increase from (0.47 to 63), (1.58 to 7.2 K.m2/W) and (0.494 to 0.797), respectively. Qussai Jihad Abdul-GhafourMohammed Aziz HassanAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleCPC collectortruncation effectthermal performanceChemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 12, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic CPC collector
truncation effect
thermal performance
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle CPC collector
truncation effect
thermal performance
Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Qussai Jihad Abdul-Ghafour
Mohammed Aziz Hassan
Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
description The design, construction and investigation of experimental study of two compound parabolic concentrators (CPCs) with tubular absorber have been presented. The performance of CPCs have been evaluated by using outdoor experimental measurements including the instantaneous thermal efficiency. The two CPCs are tested instantly by holding them on a common structure. Many tests are conducted in the present work by truncating one of them in three different levels. For each truncation the acceptance half angle (θc) was changed. Geometrically, the acceptance half angle for standard CPC is (26o). For the truncation levels for the other CPC 1, 2 and 3 the acceptance half angle were 20o, 26o and 59o, consequently. A significant difference between the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 3.86× CPC (θc=20o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o), and between that for 3.61× CPC (θc=26o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o). It's noticed that the difference between the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 2.32× CPC (θc=59o) and 2.32× CPC (θc=26o) is small compared with the difference of the first and second cases, the instantaneous thermal efficiency of 2.32× CPC (26o) was higher than those for other three CPCs. The experimental results show that the maximum thermal efficiency of the full 2.32×CPC (26o) is 0.708, the maximum thermal efficiency of the 3.93×CPC (15o), when it's truncated to 3.84× CPC (20o), 3.61× CPC (26o) and 2.32× CPC (59o)  are 0.51, 0.52 and 0.66, respectively. As the concentration ratio decreases from (3.93× to 1×), the thermal efficiency, energy losses and optical efficiency increase from (0.47 to 63), (1.58 to 7.2 K.m2/W) and (0.494 to 0.797), respectively.
format article
author Qussai Jihad Abdul-Ghafour
Mohammed Aziz Hassan
author_facet Qussai Jihad Abdul-Ghafour
Mohammed Aziz Hassan
author_sort Qussai Jihad Abdul-Ghafour
title Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
title_short Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
title_full Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
title_fullStr Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Study of the Performance of Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector
title_sort experimental study of the performance of compound parabolic concentrating solar collector
publisher Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/39214912013a41ec9a3fd652582d8bae
work_keys_str_mv AT qussaijihadabdulghafour experimentalstudyoftheperformanceofcompoundparabolicconcentratingsolarcollector
AT mohammedazizhassan experimentalstudyoftheperformanceofcompoundparabolicconcentratingsolarcollector
_version_ 1718396583132790784