Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds

Abstract Recent studies disagree on whether musicians have an advantage over non-musicians in understanding speech in noise. However, it has been suggested that musicians may be able to use differences in fundamental frequency (F0) to better understand target speech in the presence of interfering ta...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sara M. K. Madsen, Kelly L. Whiteford, Andrew J. Oxenham
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/394eca1aab504d678f77a26c6149ad11
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:394eca1aab504d678f77a26c6149ad11
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:394eca1aab504d678f77a26c6149ad112021-12-02T15:05:43ZMusicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds10.1038/s41598-017-12937-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/394eca1aab504d678f77a26c6149ad112017-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12937-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Recent studies disagree on whether musicians have an advantage over non-musicians in understanding speech in noise. However, it has been suggested that musicians may be able to use differences in fundamental frequency (F0) to better understand target speech in the presence of interfering talkers. Here we studied a relatively large (N = 60) cohort of young adults, equally divided between non-musicians and highly trained musicians, to test whether the musicians were better able to understand speech either in noise or in a two-talker competing speech masker. The target speech and competing speech were presented with either their natural F0 contours or on a monotone F0, and the F0 difference between the target and masker was systematically varied. As expected, speech intelligibility improved with increasing F0 difference between the target and the two-talker masker for both natural and monotone speech. However, no significant intelligibility advantage was observed for musicians over non-musicians in any condition. Although F0 discrimination was significantly better for musicians than for non-musicians, it was not correlated with speech scores. Overall, the results do not support the hypothesis that musical training leads to improved speech intelligibility in complex speech or noise backgrounds.Sara M. K. MadsenKelly L. WhitefordAndrew J. OxenhamNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sara M. K. Madsen
Kelly L. Whiteford
Andrew J. Oxenham
Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
description Abstract Recent studies disagree on whether musicians have an advantage over non-musicians in understanding speech in noise. However, it has been suggested that musicians may be able to use differences in fundamental frequency (F0) to better understand target speech in the presence of interfering talkers. Here we studied a relatively large (N = 60) cohort of young adults, equally divided between non-musicians and highly trained musicians, to test whether the musicians were better able to understand speech either in noise or in a two-talker competing speech masker. The target speech and competing speech were presented with either their natural F0 contours or on a monotone F0, and the F0 difference between the target and masker was systematically varied. As expected, speech intelligibility improved with increasing F0 difference between the target and the two-talker masker for both natural and monotone speech. However, no significant intelligibility advantage was observed for musicians over non-musicians in any condition. Although F0 discrimination was significantly better for musicians than for non-musicians, it was not correlated with speech scores. Overall, the results do not support the hypothesis that musical training leads to improved speech intelligibility in complex speech or noise backgrounds.
format article
author Sara M. K. Madsen
Kelly L. Whiteford
Andrew J. Oxenham
author_facet Sara M. K. Madsen
Kelly L. Whiteford
Andrew J. Oxenham
author_sort Sara M. K. Madsen
title Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
title_short Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
title_full Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
title_fullStr Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
title_full_unstemmed Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
title_sort musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/394eca1aab504d678f77a26c6149ad11
work_keys_str_mv AT saramkmadsen musiciansdonotbenefitfromdifferencesinfundamentalfrequencywhenlisteningtospeechincompetingspeechbackgrounds
AT kellylwhiteford musiciansdonotbenefitfromdifferencesinfundamentalfrequencywhenlisteningtospeechincompetingspeechbackgrounds
AT andrewjoxenham musiciansdonotbenefitfromdifferencesinfundamentalfrequencywhenlisteningtospeechincompetingspeechbackgrounds
_version_ 1718388697095733248