Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.

Management of marine ecosystems increasingly demands comprehensive and quantitative assessments of ocean health, but lacks a tool to do so. We applied the recently developed Ocean Health Index to assess ocean health in the relatively data-rich US west coast region. The overall region scored 71 out o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin S Halpern, Catherine Longo, Courtney Scarborough, Darren Hardy, Benjamin D Best, Scott C Doney, Steven K Katona, Karen L McLeod, Andrew A Rosenberg, Jameal F Samhouri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/395d6be9b72f43f6ad9d2adf0b9fc062
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:395d6be9b72f43f6ad9d2adf0b9fc062
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:395d6be9b72f43f6ad9d2adf0b9fc0622021-11-18T08:15:11ZAssessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0098995https://doaj.org/article/395d6be9b72f43f6ad9d2adf0b9fc0622014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24941007/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Management of marine ecosystems increasingly demands comprehensive and quantitative assessments of ocean health, but lacks a tool to do so. We applied the recently developed Ocean Health Index to assess ocean health in the relatively data-rich US west coast region. The overall region scored 71 out of 100, with sub-regions scoring from 65 (Washington) to 74 (Oregon). Highest scoring goals included tourism and recreation (99) and clean waters (87), while the lowest scoring goals were sense of place (48) and artisanal fishing opportunities (57). Surprisingly, even in this well-studied area data limitations precluded robust assessments of past trends in overall ocean health. Nonetheless, retrospective calculation of current status showed that many goals have declined, by up to 20%. In contrast, near-term future scores were on average 6% greater than current status across all goals and sub-regions. Application of hypothetical but realistic management scenarios illustrate how the Index can be used to predict and understand the tradeoffs among goals and consequences for overall ocean health. We illustrate and discuss how this index can be used to vet underlying assumptions and decisions with local stakeholders and decision-makers so that scores reflect regional knowledge, priorities and values. We also highlight the importance of ongoing and future monitoring that will provide robust data relevant to ocean health assessment.Benjamin S HalpernCatherine LongoCourtney ScarboroughDarren HardyBenjamin D BestScott C DoneySteven K KatonaKaren L McLeodAndrew A RosenbergJameal F SamhouriPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 6, p e98995 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Benjamin S Halpern
Catherine Longo
Courtney Scarborough
Darren Hardy
Benjamin D Best
Scott C Doney
Steven K Katona
Karen L McLeod
Andrew A Rosenberg
Jameal F Samhouri
Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
description Management of marine ecosystems increasingly demands comprehensive and quantitative assessments of ocean health, but lacks a tool to do so. We applied the recently developed Ocean Health Index to assess ocean health in the relatively data-rich US west coast region. The overall region scored 71 out of 100, with sub-regions scoring from 65 (Washington) to 74 (Oregon). Highest scoring goals included tourism and recreation (99) and clean waters (87), while the lowest scoring goals were sense of place (48) and artisanal fishing opportunities (57). Surprisingly, even in this well-studied area data limitations precluded robust assessments of past trends in overall ocean health. Nonetheless, retrospective calculation of current status showed that many goals have declined, by up to 20%. In contrast, near-term future scores were on average 6% greater than current status across all goals and sub-regions. Application of hypothetical but realistic management scenarios illustrate how the Index can be used to predict and understand the tradeoffs among goals and consequences for overall ocean health. We illustrate and discuss how this index can be used to vet underlying assumptions and decisions with local stakeholders and decision-makers so that scores reflect regional knowledge, priorities and values. We also highlight the importance of ongoing and future monitoring that will provide robust data relevant to ocean health assessment.
format article
author Benjamin S Halpern
Catherine Longo
Courtney Scarborough
Darren Hardy
Benjamin D Best
Scott C Doney
Steven K Katona
Karen L McLeod
Andrew A Rosenberg
Jameal F Samhouri
author_facet Benjamin S Halpern
Catherine Longo
Courtney Scarborough
Darren Hardy
Benjamin D Best
Scott C Doney
Steven K Katona
Karen L McLeod
Andrew A Rosenberg
Jameal F Samhouri
author_sort Benjamin S Halpern
title Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
title_short Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
title_full Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
title_fullStr Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the health of the U.S. west coast with a regional-scale application of the Ocean Health Index.
title_sort assessing the health of the u.s. west coast with a regional-scale application of the ocean health index.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/395d6be9b72f43f6ad9d2adf0b9fc062
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminshalpern assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT catherinelongo assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT courtneyscarborough assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT darrenhardy assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT benjamindbest assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT scottcdoney assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT stevenkkatona assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT karenlmcleod assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT andrewarosenberg assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
AT jamealfsamhouri assessingthehealthoftheuswestcoastwitharegionalscaleapplicationoftheoceanhealthindex
_version_ 1718421976818647040