Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method

In order to study the effect of genotype × environment interaction and stability of sugar beet varieties, four cultivars, including Shirine, Zarghan, Laetitia and 7112 hybrid were planted in five major areas near to sugar beet factory of Biseton as Kangavar, Sahneh, Chamchamal, Dinavar and Ravansar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	F. Moradi, H. Safari, A. Jalilian
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Sugar Beet Seed Institute 2012
Materias:	ammi genotype × environment interaction stability sugar beet Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/395dc921a5ba43cf805c2ea73bcdcecc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:395dc921a5ba43cf805c2ea73bcdcecc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:395dc921a5ba43cf805c2ea73bcdcecc2021-11-22T05:43:07ZStudy of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method10.22092/JSB.2012.6581735-0670https://doaj.org/article/395dc921a5ba43cf805c2ea73bcdcecc2012-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jsb.areeo.ac.ir/article_658.html?lang=enhttps://doaj.org/toc/1735-0670In order to study the effect of genotype × environment interaction and stability of sugar beet varieties, four cultivars, including Shirine, Zarghan, Laetitia and 7112 hybrid were planted in five major areas near to sugar beet factory of Biseton as Kangavar, Sahneh, Chamchamal, Dinavar and Ravansar for three years (2006-2008) using a randomized complete block designs, with three replications. Analysis of variance for root yield, sugar yield and sugar content showed that the environment and genotype main effects and genotype × environment interaction were significant. AMMI model with the first two principal components explained most of the genotype × environment interaction (99.9%, 99.3 % and 99.4 %) for root yield, sugar yield and sugar content, respec-tively. Laetitia was the best genotype based on the biplots, but had the least general adaptation to the environments and showed specific adaptation to Sahneh location. Zarghan had the most highest general adaptation to the locations, but had the average value for the traits studied. 7112 hybrid had the specific adaptation to Kangavar location. Among the locations, Sahneh was the best location, and was more similar to Chamchamal. Based on means and the first two interaction components, Dinavar was the poorest location. Therefore, Sahneh and Ravansar are recommended as suitable places for planting of sugar beet and Laetitia is suggested as the best genotype for these locations.F. MoradiH. SafariA. JalilianSugar Beet Seed Institute articleammigenotype × environment interactionstabilitysugar beetAgricultureSAgriculture (General)S1-972ENFAMajallah-i Chughundar-i Qand, Vol 28, Iss 1, Pp 29-35 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	ammi genotype × environment interaction stability sugar beet Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972
spellingShingle	ammi genotype × environment interaction stability sugar beet Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972 F. Moradi H. Safari A. Jalilian Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
description	In order to study the effect of genotype × environment interaction and stability of sugar beet varieties, four cultivars, including Shirine, Zarghan, Laetitia and 7112 hybrid were planted in five major areas near to sugar beet factory of Biseton as Kangavar, Sahneh, Chamchamal, Dinavar and Ravansar for three years (2006-2008) using a randomized complete block designs, with three replications. Analysis of variance for root yield, sugar yield and sugar content showed that the environment and genotype main effects and genotype × environment interaction were significant. AMMI model with the first two principal components explained most of the genotype × environment interaction (99.9%, 99.3 % and 99.4 %) for root yield, sugar yield and sugar content, respec-tively. Laetitia was the best genotype based on the biplots, but had the least general adaptation to the environments and showed specific adaptation to Sahneh location. Zarghan had the most highest general adaptation to the locations, but had the average value for the traits studied. 7112 hybrid had the specific adaptation to Kangavar location. Among the locations, Sahneh was the best location, and was more similar to Chamchamal. Based on means and the first two interaction components, Dinavar was the poorest location. Therefore, Sahneh and Ravansar are recommended as suitable places for planting of sugar beet and Laetitia is suggested as the best genotype for these locations.
format	article
author	F. Moradi H. Safari A. Jalilian
author_facet	F. Moradi H. Safari A. Jalilian
author_sort	F. Moradi
title	Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
title_short	Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
title_full	Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
title_fullStr	Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
title_full_unstemmed	Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method
title_sort	study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using ammi method
publisher	Sugar Beet Seed Institute
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/395dc921a5ba43cf805c2ea73bcdcecc
work_keys_str_mv	AT fmoradi studyofgenotypeenvironmentinteractionforsugarbeetmonogermcultivarsusingammimethod AT hsafari studyofgenotypeenvironmentinteractionforsugarbeetmonogermcultivarsusingammimethod AT ajalilian studyofgenotypeenvironmentinteractionforsugarbeetmonogermcultivarsusingammimethod
_version_	1718418095118221312

Study of genotype ×environment interaction for sugar beet monogerm cultivars using AMMI method

Ejemplares similares