NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION

With the abandonment of the material world in art in the 20th century, when humans produced their plasticized versions of art understood by the mind beyond the senses, the face of art as well as the perspective of the artists underwent a profound change, which led to balanced compositions that avoid...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Melek AKYÜREK
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2019
Materias:
neo
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/396525298d444e6eb2713ceea892890d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:396525298d444e6eb2713ceea892890d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:396525298d444e6eb2713ceea892890d2021-11-24T09:20:47ZNEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION2148-416310.9761/JASSS6981https://doaj.org/article/396525298d444e6eb2713ceea892890d2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=1508698097_15-Yrd.%20Do%C3%A7.%20Dr.%20Melek%20Aky%C3%BCrek.pdf&key=28250https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163With the abandonment of the material world in art in the 20th century, when humans produced their plasticized versions of art understood by the mind beyond the senses, the face of art as well as the perspective of the artists underwent a profound change, which led to balanced compositions that avoided representing nature and depicted geometric objects without volume using primary colours. This movement, led by artists such as Piet Mondrian, Theo Van Doesburg, Bart van der Leck, Georges Vantongerloo, and Vilmos Huszár was called neoplasticism. This study aims to describe the basics and the aims of neoplasticism and to analyze the works of art by artists of this movement. Neoplasticism was especially dominant between 1912 and 1917, and theoretical and plastic studies were made in this period. It added a new dimension to style and content of art, and through the use of abstraction and production of abstract works of art, introduced a new understanding of style of universal items. By abandoning simile, this movement of art brushed aside the centuries long tradition of imitation of nature, and its works of art were in line with the new view of world. For the purposes of this study, books, journals, articles, reports on the movement were reviewed, and the philosophies and analyses of the works of art of the artists were described. The pictures analyzed in this study are limited to the artists who were part of this movement. Conclusions were made according to the analyses performed.Melek AKYÜREKFırat Universityarticleneoplasticism, abstraction, abstract, piet mondrian, theo van doesburgSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 10, Iss 55, Pp 209-224 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic neo
plasticism, abstraction, abstract, piet mondrian, theo van doesburg
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle neo
plasticism, abstraction, abstract, piet mondrian, theo van doesburg
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Melek AKYÜREK
NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
description With the abandonment of the material world in art in the 20th century, when humans produced their plasticized versions of art understood by the mind beyond the senses, the face of art as well as the perspective of the artists underwent a profound change, which led to balanced compositions that avoided representing nature and depicted geometric objects without volume using primary colours. This movement, led by artists such as Piet Mondrian, Theo Van Doesburg, Bart van der Leck, Georges Vantongerloo, and Vilmos Huszár was called neoplasticism. This study aims to describe the basics and the aims of neoplasticism and to analyze the works of art by artists of this movement. Neoplasticism was especially dominant between 1912 and 1917, and theoretical and plastic studies were made in this period. It added a new dimension to style and content of art, and through the use of abstraction and production of abstract works of art, introduced a new understanding of style of universal items. By abandoning simile, this movement of art brushed aside the centuries long tradition of imitation of nature, and its works of art were in line with the new view of world. For the purposes of this study, books, journals, articles, reports on the movement were reviewed, and the philosophies and analyses of the works of art of the artists were described. The pictures analyzed in this study are limited to the artists who were part of this movement. Conclusions were made according to the analyses performed.
format article
author Melek AKYÜREK
author_facet Melek AKYÜREK
author_sort Melek AKYÜREK
title NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
title_short NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
title_full NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
title_fullStr NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
title_full_unstemmed NEO-PLASTICISM: THE ABSTRACT FACE OF ART, AND THE FACE OF ART IN ABSTRACTION
title_sort neo-plasticism: the abstract face of art, and the face of art in abstraction
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/396525298d444e6eb2713ceea892890d
work_keys_str_mv AT melekakyurek neoplasticismtheabstractfaceofartandthefaceofartinabstraction
_version_ 1718415536789913600