Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open acces...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Resilience Alliance
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a12021-11-15T16:40:18ZInvesting in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access1708-308710.5751/ES-12339-260216https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a12021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss2/art16/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open access. We modeled a recreational harvest fishery in which local or centralized managers invest in fish stocking to maximize social welfare. Although classic open access dissipation of rents occurs at equilibrium, the sluggish response of fishing effort to changing conditions allows welfare to accrue in transition to equilibrium. This transient welfare creates persistent incentives to invest. Empirical observations showed that stocking by local collective action groups occurred at rates similar to model-predicted optima, while centralized stocking occurred at rates greater than predicted optima. Our results emphasize the potential benefits of local involvement in managing the commons, even under conditions that were previously thought to preclude effective collective action.Jacob P. ZieglerSunny L. JardineStuart E. JonesBrett T. van PoortenMarco A. JanssenChristopher T. SolomonResilience Alliancearticleanglercollective actioncommon pool resourcefish stockingfisherylake associationopen accesspolycentric governancesocial-ecological systemBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 2, p 16 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
angler collective action common pool resource fish stocking fishery lake association open access polycentric governance social-ecological system Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
angler collective action common pool resource fish stocking fishery lake association open access polycentric governance social-ecological system Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 Jacob P. Ziegler Sunny L. Jardine Stuart E. Jones Brett T. van Poorten Marco A. Janssen Christopher T. Solomon Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
description |
Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open access. We modeled a recreational harvest fishery in which local or centralized managers invest in fish stocking to maximize social welfare. Although classic open access dissipation of rents occurs at equilibrium, the sluggish response of fishing effort to changing conditions allows welfare to accrue in transition to equilibrium. This transient welfare creates persistent incentives to invest. Empirical observations showed that stocking by local collective action groups occurred at rates similar to model-predicted optima, while centralized stocking occurred at rates greater than predicted optima. Our results emphasize the potential benefits of local involvement in managing the commons, even under conditions that were previously thought to preclude effective collective action. |
format |
article |
author |
Jacob P. Ziegler Sunny L. Jardine Stuart E. Jones Brett T. van Poorten Marco A. Janssen Christopher T. Solomon |
author_facet |
Jacob P. Ziegler Sunny L. Jardine Stuart E. Jones Brett T. van Poorten Marco A. Janssen Christopher T. Solomon |
author_sort |
Jacob P. Ziegler |
title |
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
title_short |
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
title_full |
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
title_fullStr |
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
title_sort |
investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jacobpziegler investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess AT sunnyljardine investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess AT stuartejones investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess AT bretttvanpoorten investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess AT marcoajanssen investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess AT christophertsolomon investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess |
_version_ |
1718426897428250624 |