Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access

Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open acces...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob P. Ziegler, Sunny L. Jardine, Stuart E. Jones, Brett T. van Poorten, Marco A. Janssen, Christopher T. Solomon
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a12021-11-15T16:40:18ZInvesting in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access1708-308710.5751/ES-12339-260216https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a12021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss2/art16/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open access. We modeled a recreational harvest fishery in which local or centralized managers invest in fish stocking to maximize social welfare. Although classic open access dissipation of rents occurs at equilibrium, the sluggish response of fishing effort to changing conditions allows welfare to accrue in transition to equilibrium. This transient welfare creates persistent incentives to invest. Empirical observations showed that stocking by local collective action groups occurred at rates similar to model-predicted optima, while centralized stocking occurred at rates greater than predicted optima. Our results emphasize the potential benefits of local involvement in managing the commons, even under conditions that were previously thought to preclude effective collective action.Jacob P. ZieglerSunny L. JardineStuart E. JonesBrett T. van PoortenMarco A. JanssenChristopher T. SolomonResilience Alliancearticleanglercollective actioncommon pool resourcefish stockingfisherylake associationopen accesspolycentric governancesocial-ecological systemBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 2, p 16 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic angler
collective action
common pool resource
fish stocking
fishery
lake association
open access
polycentric governance
social-ecological system
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle angler
collective action
common pool resource
fish stocking
fishery
lake association
open access
polycentric governance
social-ecological system
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Jacob P. Ziegler
Sunny L. Jardine
Stuart E. Jones
Brett T. van Poorten
Marco A. Janssen
Christopher T. Solomon
Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
description Local users may invest in managing common pool resources, thereby promoting social and ecological resilience. Institutional or economic limits on access are regarded as essential preconditions for incentivizing local investments, but we show that investment incentives can exist even under open access. We modeled a recreational harvest fishery in which local or centralized managers invest in fish stocking to maximize social welfare. Although classic open access dissipation of rents occurs at equilibrium, the sluggish response of fishing effort to changing conditions allows welfare to accrue in transition to equilibrium. This transient welfare creates persistent incentives to invest. Empirical observations showed that stocking by local collective action groups occurred at rates similar to model-predicted optima, while centralized stocking occurred at rates greater than predicted optima. Our results emphasize the potential benefits of local involvement in managing the commons, even under conditions that were previously thought to preclude effective collective action.
format article
author Jacob P. Ziegler
Sunny L. Jardine
Stuart E. Jones
Brett T. van Poorten
Marco A. Janssen
Christopher T. Solomon
author_facet Jacob P. Ziegler
Sunny L. Jardine
Stuart E. Jones
Brett T. van Poorten
Marco A. Janssen
Christopher T. Solomon
author_sort Jacob P. Ziegler
title Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
title_short Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
title_full Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
title_fullStr Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
title_full_unstemmed Investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
title_sort investing in the commons: transient welfare creates incentives despite open access
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/396cb96855614c47be735b635a6f82a1
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobpziegler investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
AT sunnyljardine investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
AT stuartejones investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
AT bretttvanpoorten investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
AT marcoajanssen investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
AT christophertsolomon investinginthecommonstransientwelfarecreatesincentivesdespiteopenaccess
_version_ 1718426897428250624