Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study

Christopher S Sáles,1 Edward E Manche2 1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 2Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Purpose: To compare self-reported quality of vision (QoV) outcomes after myopic LASIK (laser-assisted in situ kerato...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sáles CS, Manche EE
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/39745619fc0b495f87b4e9e8b17ae045
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:39745619fc0b495f87b4e9e8b17ae045
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:39745619fc0b495f87b4e9e8b17ae0452021-12-02T01:00:59ZComparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/39745619fc0b495f87b4e9e8b17ae0452016-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-self-reported-quality-of-vision-outcomes-after-myopic-la-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Christopher S Sáles,1 Edward E Manche2 1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 2Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Purpose: To compare self-reported quality of vision (QoV) outcomes after myopic LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) with two femtosecond lasers.Design: Prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye study.Methods: Consecutive myopic patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK bilaterally. Eyes were randomized according to ocular dominance. The flap of one eye was made with the IntraLase FS 60 kHz femtosecond laser with a conventional 70° side-cut, and the flap of the fellow eye was made with the IntraLase iFS 150 kHz femtosecond laser with an inverted 130° side-cut. Patients completed the validated, Rasch-tested, linear-scaled 30-item QoV questionnaire preoperatively and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12.Results: The study enrolled 120 fellow eyes in 60 patients. None of the measured QoV parameters exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups preoperatively or at any postoperative time point.Conclusion: Creating LASIK flaps with an inverted side-cut using a 150 kHz femtosecond laser and with a conventional 70° side-cut using a 60 kHz femtosecond laser resulted in no significant differences in self-reported QoV assessed by the QoV questionnaire. Keywords: quality of vision, femtosecond, LASIK, wavefront-guided, myopiaSáles CSManche EEDove Medical PressarticleQuality of visionfemtosecondLASIKOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1691-1699 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Quality of vision
femtosecond
LASIK
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Quality of vision
femtosecond
LASIK
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Sáles CS
Manche EE
Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
description Christopher S Sáles,1 Edward E Manche2 1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 2Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Purpose: To compare self-reported quality of vision (QoV) outcomes after myopic LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) with two femtosecond lasers.Design: Prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye study.Methods: Consecutive myopic patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK bilaterally. Eyes were randomized according to ocular dominance. The flap of one eye was made with the IntraLase FS 60 kHz femtosecond laser with a conventional 70° side-cut, and the flap of the fellow eye was made with the IntraLase iFS 150 kHz femtosecond laser with an inverted 130° side-cut. Patients completed the validated, Rasch-tested, linear-scaled 30-item QoV questionnaire preoperatively and at Months 1, 3, 6, and 12.Results: The study enrolled 120 fellow eyes in 60 patients. None of the measured QoV parameters exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups preoperatively or at any postoperative time point.Conclusion: Creating LASIK flaps with an inverted side-cut using a 150 kHz femtosecond laser and with a conventional 70° side-cut using a 60 kHz femtosecond laser resulted in no significant differences in self-reported QoV assessed by the QoV questionnaire. Keywords: quality of vision, femtosecond, LASIK, wavefront-guided, myopia
format article
author Sáles CS
Manche EE
author_facet Sáles CS
Manche EE
author_sort Sáles CS
title Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
title_short Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
title_full Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
title_fullStr Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic LASIK with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
title_sort comparison of self-reported quality of vision outcomes after myopic lasik with two femtosecond lasers: a prospective, eye-to-eye study
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/39745619fc0b495f87b4e9e8b17ae045
work_keys_str_mv AT salescs comparisonofselfreportedqualityofvisionoutcomesaftermyopiclasikwithtwofemtosecondlasersaprospectiveeyetoeyestudy
AT mancheee comparisonofselfreportedqualityofvisionoutcomesaftermyopiclasikwithtwofemtosecondlasersaprospectiveeyetoeyestudy
_version_ 1718403376996155392