Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) pharmacological stress-testing is a well-established technique for detecting myocardial ischemia. Although stressors and contrast agents seem relatively safe, contraindications and side effects must be considered. Substantial costs are further limiting it...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreas Ochs, Michael Nippes, Janek Salatzki, Lukas D. Weberling, Johannes Riffel, Matthias Müller-Hennessen, Evangelos Giannitsis, Nael Osman, Christian Stehning, Florian André, Hugo A. Katus, Norbert Frey, Matthias G. Friedrich, Marco M. Ochs
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
CMR
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/39e671a4e5d249b4ac10c23457563485
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:39e671a4e5d249b4ac10c23457563485
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:39e671a4e5d249b4ac10c234575634852021-12-01T12:34:51ZDynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test2297-055X10.3389/fcvm.2021.755759https://doaj.org/article/39e671a4e5d249b4ac10c234575634852021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.755759/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2297-055XBackground: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) pharmacological stress-testing is a well-established technique for detecting myocardial ischemia. Although stressors and contrast agents seem relatively safe, contraindications and side effects must be considered. Substantial costs are further limiting its applicability. Dynamic handgrip exercise (DHE) may have the potential to address these shortcomings as a physiological stressor. We therefore evaluated the feasibility and physiologic stress response of DHE in relation to pharmacological dobutamine-stimulation within the context of CMR examinations.Methods: Two groups were prospectively enrolled: (I) volunteers without relevant disease and (II) patients with known CAD referred for stress-testing. A both-handed, metronome-guided DHE was performed over 2 min continuously with 80 contractions/minute by all participants, whereas dobutamine stress-testing was only performed in group (II). Short axis strain by fast-Strain-ENCoded imaging was acquired at rest, immediately after DHE and during dobutamine infusion.Results: Eighty middle-aged individuals (age 56 ± 17 years, 48 men) were enrolled. DHE triggered significant positive chronotropic (HRrest: 68 ± 10 bpm, HRDHE: 91 ± 13 bpm, p < 0.001) and inotropic stress response (GLSrest: −19.4 ± 1.9%, GLSDHE: −20.6 ± 2.1%, p < 0.001). Exercise-induced increase of longitudinal strain was present in healthy volunteers and patients with CAD to the same extent, but in general more pronounced in the midventricular and apical layers (p < 0.01). DHE was aborted by a minor portion (7%) due to peripheral fatigue. The inotropic effect of DHE appears to be non-inferior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation (GLSDHE= −19.5 ± 2.3%, GLSDob= −19.1 ± 3.1%, p = n.s.), whereas its chronotropic effect was superior (HRDHE= 89 ± 14 bpm, HRDob= 78 ± 15 bpm, p < 0.001).Conclusions: DHE causes positive ino- and chronotropic effects superior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation, suggesting a relevant increase of myocardial oxygen demand. DHE appears to be safe and timesaving with broad applicability. The data encourages further studies to determine its potential to detect obstructive CAD.Andreas OchsMichael NippesJanek SalatzkiLukas D. WeberlingLukas D. WeberlingJohannes RiffelJohannes RiffelMatthias Müller-HennessenMatthias Müller-HennessenEvangelos GiannitsisEvangelos GiannitsisNael OsmanNael OsmanChristian StehningFlorian AndréFlorian AndréHugo A. KatusHugo A. KatusNorbert FreyNorbert FreyMatthias G. FriedrichMatthias G. FriedrichMarco M. OchsMarco M. OchsFrontiers Media S.A.articlestress-testhandgriplongitudinal strainfSENCCMRDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic stress-test
handgrip
longitudinal strain
fSENC
CMR
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle stress-test
handgrip
longitudinal strain
fSENC
CMR
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Andreas Ochs
Michael Nippes
Janek Salatzki
Lukas D. Weberling
Lukas D. Weberling
Johannes Riffel
Johannes Riffel
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Evangelos Giannitsis
Evangelos Giannitsis
Nael Osman
Nael Osman
Christian Stehning
Florian André
Florian André
Hugo A. Katus
Hugo A. Katus
Norbert Frey
Norbert Frey
Matthias G. Friedrich
Matthias G. Friedrich
Marco M. Ochs
Marco M. Ochs
Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
description Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) pharmacological stress-testing is a well-established technique for detecting myocardial ischemia. Although stressors and contrast agents seem relatively safe, contraindications and side effects must be considered. Substantial costs are further limiting its applicability. Dynamic handgrip exercise (DHE) may have the potential to address these shortcomings as a physiological stressor. We therefore evaluated the feasibility and physiologic stress response of DHE in relation to pharmacological dobutamine-stimulation within the context of CMR examinations.Methods: Two groups were prospectively enrolled: (I) volunteers without relevant disease and (II) patients with known CAD referred for stress-testing. A both-handed, metronome-guided DHE was performed over 2 min continuously with 80 contractions/minute by all participants, whereas dobutamine stress-testing was only performed in group (II). Short axis strain by fast-Strain-ENCoded imaging was acquired at rest, immediately after DHE and during dobutamine infusion.Results: Eighty middle-aged individuals (age 56 ± 17 years, 48 men) were enrolled. DHE triggered significant positive chronotropic (HRrest: 68 ± 10 bpm, HRDHE: 91 ± 13 bpm, p < 0.001) and inotropic stress response (GLSrest: −19.4 ± 1.9%, GLSDHE: −20.6 ± 2.1%, p < 0.001). Exercise-induced increase of longitudinal strain was present in healthy volunteers and patients with CAD to the same extent, but in general more pronounced in the midventricular and apical layers (p < 0.01). DHE was aborted by a minor portion (7%) due to peripheral fatigue. The inotropic effect of DHE appears to be non-inferior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation (GLSDHE= −19.5 ± 2.3%, GLSDob= −19.1 ± 3.1%, p = n.s.), whereas its chronotropic effect was superior (HRDHE= 89 ± 14 bpm, HRDob= 78 ± 15 bpm, p < 0.001).Conclusions: DHE causes positive ino- and chronotropic effects superior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation, suggesting a relevant increase of myocardial oxygen demand. DHE appears to be safe and timesaving with broad applicability. The data encourages further studies to determine its potential to detect obstructive CAD.
format article
author Andreas Ochs
Michael Nippes
Janek Salatzki
Lukas D. Weberling
Lukas D. Weberling
Johannes Riffel
Johannes Riffel
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Evangelos Giannitsis
Evangelos Giannitsis
Nael Osman
Nael Osman
Christian Stehning
Florian André
Florian André
Hugo A. Katus
Hugo A. Katus
Norbert Frey
Norbert Frey
Matthias G. Friedrich
Matthias G. Friedrich
Marco M. Ochs
Marco M. Ochs
author_facet Andreas Ochs
Michael Nippes
Janek Salatzki
Lukas D. Weberling
Lukas D. Weberling
Johannes Riffel
Johannes Riffel
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Matthias Müller-Hennessen
Evangelos Giannitsis
Evangelos Giannitsis
Nael Osman
Nael Osman
Christian Stehning
Florian André
Florian André
Hugo A. Katus
Hugo A. Katus
Norbert Frey
Norbert Frey
Matthias G. Friedrich
Matthias G. Friedrich
Marco M. Ochs
Marco M. Ochs
author_sort Andreas Ochs
title Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
title_short Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
title_full Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
title_fullStr Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test
title_sort dynamic handgrip exercise: feasibility and physiologic stress response of a potential needle-free cardiac magnetic resonance stress test
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/39e671a4e5d249b4ac10c23457563485
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasochs dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT michaelnippes dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT janeksalatzki dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT lukasdweberling dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT lukasdweberling dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT johannesriffel dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT johannesriffel dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT matthiasmullerhennessen dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT matthiasmullerhennessen dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT evangelosgiannitsis dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT evangelosgiannitsis dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT naelosman dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT naelosman dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT christianstehning dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT florianandre dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT florianandre dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT hugoakatus dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT hugoakatus dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT norbertfrey dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT norbertfrey dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT matthiasgfriedrich dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT matthiasgfriedrich dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT marcomochs dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
AT marcomochs dynamichandgripexercisefeasibilityandphysiologicstressresponseofapotentialneedlefreecardiacmagneticresonancestresstest
_version_ 1718405168246030336