Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract We tested the effectiveness of a program consisting of motivational interviewing (MI) and feedback of urine cotinine to stop passive smoking (PS) in children at risk for asthma. Fifty-eight families with children 0–13 years with a high risk of asthma and PS exposure were randomised in a one...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sasha G. Hutchinson, Gerard van Breukelen, Constant P. van Schayck, Brigitte Essers, S. Katharine Hammond, Jean W. M. Muris, Frans J. M. Feron, Edward Dompeling
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/39f61e4c610e42518f12b643701d580e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:39f61e4c610e42518f12b643701d580e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:39f61e4c610e42518f12b643701d580e2021-12-02T15:05:50ZMotivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial10.1038/s41598-017-15158-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/39f61e4c610e42518f12b643701d580e2017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15158-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract We tested the effectiveness of a program consisting of motivational interviewing (MI) and feedback of urine cotinine to stop passive smoking (PS) in children at risk for asthma. Fifty-eight families with children 0–13 years with a high risk of asthma and PS exposure were randomised in a one-year follow-up study. The intervention group received the intervention program during 6 sessions (1/month) and the control group received measurements (questionnaires, urine cotinine, and lung function) only. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of families stopping PS (parental report verified and unverified with the child’s urine cotinine concentration <10 μg/l) in children during the intervention program. The analyses were performed with Mixed Logistic Regression. After 6 months, a significant group difference was observed for the unverified parental report of stopping PS in children: 27% of parents in the intervention group versus 7% in the control group. For the verified parental report, the difference was similar (23% versus 7%) but was not statistically significant. Despite a limited sample size, the results suggest that the intervention program is probably an effective strategy to stop PS in children. A program longer than 6 months might be necessary for a longer lasting intervention effect.Sasha G. HutchinsonGerard van BreukelenConstant P. van SchayckBrigitte EssersS. Katharine HammondJean W. M. MurisFrans J. M. FeronEdward DompelingNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sasha G. Hutchinson
Gerard van Breukelen
Constant P. van Schayck
Brigitte Essers
S. Katharine Hammond
Jean W. M. Muris
Frans J. M. Feron
Edward Dompeling
Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
description Abstract We tested the effectiveness of a program consisting of motivational interviewing (MI) and feedback of urine cotinine to stop passive smoking (PS) in children at risk for asthma. Fifty-eight families with children 0–13 years with a high risk of asthma and PS exposure were randomised in a one-year follow-up study. The intervention group received the intervention program during 6 sessions (1/month) and the control group received measurements (questionnaires, urine cotinine, and lung function) only. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of families stopping PS (parental report verified and unverified with the child’s urine cotinine concentration <10 μg/l) in children during the intervention program. The analyses were performed with Mixed Logistic Regression. After 6 months, a significant group difference was observed for the unverified parental report of stopping PS in children: 27% of parents in the intervention group versus 7% in the control group. For the verified parental report, the difference was similar (23% versus 7%) but was not statistically significant. Despite a limited sample size, the results suggest that the intervention program is probably an effective strategy to stop PS in children. A program longer than 6 months might be necessary for a longer lasting intervention effect.
format article
author Sasha G. Hutchinson
Gerard van Breukelen
Constant P. van Schayck
Brigitte Essers
S. Katharine Hammond
Jean W. M. Muris
Frans J. M. Feron
Edward Dompeling
author_facet Sasha G. Hutchinson
Gerard van Breukelen
Constant P. van Schayck
Brigitte Essers
S. Katharine Hammond
Jean W. M. Muris
Frans J. M. Feron
Edward Dompeling
author_sort Sasha G. Hutchinson
title Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort motivational interviewing and urine cotinine feedback to stop passive smoke exposure in children predisposed to asthma: a randomised controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/39f61e4c610e42518f12b643701d580e
work_keys_str_mv AT sashaghutchinson motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gerardvanbreukelen motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT constantpvanschayck motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brigitteessers motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT skatharinehammond motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jeanwmmuris motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fransjmferon motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT edwarddompeling motivationalinterviewingandurinecotininefeedbacktostoppassivesmokeexposureinchildrenpredisposedtoasthmaarandomisedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718388697298108416