Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

Objectives. To evaluate the microhardness of tooth enamel remineralized with enamel matrix protein solution as well as the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to this surface. Materials and Methods. In total, 24 human premolars were selected and divided into 3 experimental groups (n =...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guilherme Genovez-Júnior, Sandrine Bittencourt Berger, Lucineide Lima dos Santos, Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse Paloco, Murilo Baena Lopes, Débora Fernandes Giuliangeli, Júlia Graciela Monteiro dos Santos, Ricardo Danil Guiraldo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hindawi Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3a68e69eedd94adf8fcbed0e1201d72c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3a68e69eedd94adf8fcbed0e1201d72c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3a68e69eedd94adf8fcbed0e1201d72c2021-11-08T02:35:35ZEffect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets1687-873610.1155/2021/7025910https://doaj.org/article/3a68e69eedd94adf8fcbed0e1201d72c2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7025910https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8736Objectives. To evaluate the microhardness of tooth enamel remineralized with enamel matrix protein solution as well as the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to this surface. Materials and Methods. In total, 24 human premolars were selected and divided into 3 experimental groups (n = 8): SE—sound enamel, DE—demineralized enamel, and TE—demineralized enamel treated with amelogenin solution. Samples from DE and TE groups were subjected to pH cycling to induce initial artificial caries lesion. TE group was treated with amelogenin solution. Samples were placed in artificial saliva for 7 days. Knoop microhardness was measured before any intervention (T0), after pH cycling (T1) and after amelogenin solution treatment application (T2). Twenty-four hours after ceramic orthodontic brackets were bonded, samples were subjected to shear test in a universal testing machine. Microhardness and shear measurement distributions were subjected to Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, which was followed by parametric tests (α = 0.05): 2-way analysis of variance (factors: enamel condition × treatment) and Tukey posttest for all three groups (SE, DE, and TE) in T0 and T2 for microhardness; analysis of variance and Tukey’s test, for shear bond strength test. Results. Means recorded for Knoop microhardness in T2, for the SE (366.7 KHN) and TE (342.8 KHN) groups, were significantly higher than those recorded for the DE group (263.5 KHN). The shear bond strength of the SE (15.44 MPa) and TE (14.84 MPa) groups statistically differed from that of the DE group (11.95 MPa). Conclusion. In vitro demineralized enamel treatment with amelogenin solution was capable of taking samples’ hardness back to levels similar to those observed for sound enamel. The shear bond strength on the enamel subjected to this treatment was similar to that observed for healthy enamel and higher than that observed for demineralized enamel.Guilherme Genovez-JúniorSandrine Bittencourt BergerLucineide Lima dos SantosEloisa Aparecida Carlesse PalocoMurilo Baena LopesDébora Fernandes GiuliangeliJúlia Graciela Monteiro dos SantosRicardo Danil GuiraldoHindawi LimitedarticleDentistryRK1-715ENInternational Journal of Dentistry, Vol 2021 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Dentistry
RK1-715
Guilherme Genovez-Júnior
Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
Lucineide Lima dos Santos
Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse Paloco
Murilo Baena Lopes
Débora Fernandes Giuliangeli
Júlia Graciela Monteiro dos Santos
Ricardo Danil Guiraldo
Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
description Objectives. To evaluate the microhardness of tooth enamel remineralized with enamel matrix protein solution as well as the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to this surface. Materials and Methods. In total, 24 human premolars were selected and divided into 3 experimental groups (n = 8): SE—sound enamel, DE—demineralized enamel, and TE—demineralized enamel treated with amelogenin solution. Samples from DE and TE groups were subjected to pH cycling to induce initial artificial caries lesion. TE group was treated with amelogenin solution. Samples were placed in artificial saliva for 7 days. Knoop microhardness was measured before any intervention (T0), after pH cycling (T1) and after amelogenin solution treatment application (T2). Twenty-four hours after ceramic orthodontic brackets were bonded, samples were subjected to shear test in a universal testing machine. Microhardness and shear measurement distributions were subjected to Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, which was followed by parametric tests (α = 0.05): 2-way analysis of variance (factors: enamel condition × treatment) and Tukey posttest for all three groups (SE, DE, and TE) in T0 and T2 for microhardness; analysis of variance and Tukey’s test, for shear bond strength test. Results. Means recorded for Knoop microhardness in T2, for the SE (366.7 KHN) and TE (342.8 KHN) groups, were significantly higher than those recorded for the DE group (263.5 KHN). The shear bond strength of the SE (15.44 MPa) and TE (14.84 MPa) groups statistically differed from that of the DE group (11.95 MPa). Conclusion. In vitro demineralized enamel treatment with amelogenin solution was capable of taking samples’ hardness back to levels similar to those observed for sound enamel. The shear bond strength on the enamel subjected to this treatment was similar to that observed for healthy enamel and higher than that observed for demineralized enamel.
format article
author Guilherme Genovez-Júnior
Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
Lucineide Lima dos Santos
Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse Paloco
Murilo Baena Lopes
Débora Fernandes Giuliangeli
Júlia Graciela Monteiro dos Santos
Ricardo Danil Guiraldo
author_facet Guilherme Genovez-Júnior
Sandrine Bittencourt Berger
Lucineide Lima dos Santos
Eloisa Aparecida Carlesse Paloco
Murilo Baena Lopes
Débora Fernandes Giuliangeli
Júlia Graciela Monteiro dos Santos
Ricardo Danil Guiraldo
author_sort Guilherme Genovez-Júnior
title Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_short Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_fullStr Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Amelogenin Solution in the Microhardness of Remineralized Enamel and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_sort effect of amelogenin solution in the microhardness of remineralized enamel and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3a68e69eedd94adf8fcbed0e1201d72c
work_keys_str_mv AT guilhermegenovezjunior effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT sandrinebittencourtberger effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT lucineidelimadossantos effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT eloisaaparecidacarlessepaloco effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT murilobaenalopes effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT deborafernandesgiuliangeli effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT juliagracielamonteirodossantos effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT ricardodanilguiraldo effectofamelogeninsolutioninthemicrohardnessofremineralizedenamelandshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
_version_ 1718443175226376192