Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis

Happiness has been proposed as an alternative goal in welfare analyses. Several indices have been proposed for its measurement but studies about their metric properties and validity are insufficient. In this paper, the Happy Planet Index is analyzed in terms of its consequential validity as a globa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdrón
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Universidad de San Buenaventura 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3a78e8c585c44a03bc0ec1f73e9a33a0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3a78e8c585c44a03bc0ec1f73e9a33a0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3a78e8c585c44a03bc0ec1f73e9a33a02021-11-17T02:21:43ZInter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis2011-20842011-7922https://doaj.org/article/3a78e8c585c44a03bc0ec1f73e9a33a02017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/IJPR/article/view/2995https://doaj.org/toc/2011-2084https://doaj.org/toc/2011-7922 Happiness has been proposed as an alternative goal in welfare analyses. Several indices have been proposed for its measurement but studies about their metric properties and validity are insufficient. In this paper, the Happy Planet Index is analyzed in terms of its consequential validity as a global health inequality indicator from the invariant measurement perspective of the Rasch model. Model fit is analyzed with emphasis on differential item functioning when comparing between world regions, and its consequential validity by comparing conclusions about the magnitude and inequalities in countries’ happiness. Main findings show enough evidences for structural and construct validity, but not for the supposed underlying score distribution; not either for its generalizability because of sever differential functioning. Conclusions about the magnitude of geographical inequalities and happiest countries substantially differed between the original index and the Rasch measure.  Diego Fernando Rojas-GualdrónUniversidad de San BuenaventuraarticleEconomicsGlobal healthHappinessHealth InequalitiesValidation studiesPsychologyBF1-990ENESInternational Journal of Psychological Research, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Economics
Global health
Happiness
Health Inequalities
Validation studies
Psychology
BF1-990
Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdrón
Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
description Happiness has been proposed as an alternative goal in welfare analyses. Several indices have been proposed for its measurement but studies about their metric properties and validity are insufficient. In this paper, the Happy Planet Index is analyzed in terms of its consequential validity as a global health inequality indicator from the invariant measurement perspective of the Rasch model. Model fit is analyzed with emphasis on differential item functioning when comparing between world regions, and its consequential validity by comparing conclusions about the magnitude and inequalities in countries’ happiness. Main findings show enough evidences for structural and construct validity, but not for the supposed underlying score distribution; not either for its generalizability because of sever differential functioning. Conclusions about the magnitude of geographical inequalities and happiest countries substantially differed between the original index and the Rasch measure. 
format article
author Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdrón
author_facet Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdrón
author_sort Diego Fernando Rojas-Gualdrón
title Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_short Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_full Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_fullStr Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_full_unstemmed Inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. A Rasch based consequential validity analysis
title_sort inter-regional metric disadvantages when comparing countries’ happiness on a global scale. a rasch based consequential validity analysis
publisher Universidad de San Buenaventura
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/3a78e8c585c44a03bc0ec1f73e9a33a0
work_keys_str_mv AT diegofernandorojasgualdron interregionalmetricdisadvantageswhencomparingcountrieshappinessonaglobalscalearaschbasedconsequentialvalidityanalysis
_version_ 1718426042188693504