The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract Background The CADILLAC risk score was developed to identify patients at low risk for adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods We performed a single center retrospective review...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan S. Wilson, Peter Malamas, Brent Dembo, Sumeet K. Lall, Ninad Zaman, Brandon R. Peterson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3a85ef91091546c086c405d7f4b3acf6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3a85ef91091546c086c405d7f4b3acf6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3a85ef91091546c086c405d7f4b3acf62021-11-14T12:07:33ZThe CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction10.1186/s12872-021-02348-01471-2261https://doaj.org/article/3a85ef91091546c086c405d7f4b3acf62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02348-0https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2261Abstract Background The CADILLAC risk score was developed to identify patients at low risk for adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods We performed a single center retrospective review of STEMI hospitalizations treated with PPCI from 2014 to 2018. Patients were stratified using the CADILLAC risk score into low risk, intermediate risk and high risk groups. Patients presenting with cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was adverse clinical events during initial hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were adverse clinical events at 30 days and 1 year following index hospitalization. Results The study included 341 patients. Compared to patients with a low CADILLAC score, adverse clinical events were similar in the intermediate risk group during hospitalization (OR 1.23, CI 0.37–4.05, p 0.733) and at 30 days (OR 2.27, CI 0.93–5.56, p 0.0733) while adverse clinical events were significantly elevated in the high risk group during hospitalization (OR 4.75, CI 1.91–11.84, p 0.0008) and at 30 days (OR 8.73, CI 4.02–18.96, p < 0.0001). At 1 year follow-up, compared to the low risk CADILLAC group (9.4% adverse clinical event rate), cumulative adverse clinical events were significantly higher in the intermediate risk group (22.9% event rate, OR 2.86, CI 1.39–5.89, p 0.0044) and in the elevated risk group (58.6% event rate, OR 13.67, CI 6.81–27.43, p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was 0% for patients defined at low risk by CADILLAC score during hospitalization, as well up to 1 year follow up. On receiver operating curve analysis, discrimination of in-hospital adverse clinical events was fair using CADILLAC (C = 0.66, odds ratio 1.18; 95% CI 1.04–1.33; p = 0.0064) with somewhat better discrimination at 30-day follow-up (C = 0.719) and 1-year follow-up (C = 0.715). Conclusion Patients defined as low risk by the CADILLAC score following a STEMI were associated with lower mortality and adverse clinical event rates during hospitalization and up to 1 year following STEMI when compared to those with an intermediate or high CADILLAC score.Ryan S. WilsonPeter MalamasBrent DemboSumeet K. LallNinad ZamanBrandon R. PetersonBMCarticleST segment elevation myocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseRisk stratificationDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENBMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Coronary artery disease
Risk stratification
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
Coronary artery disease
Risk stratification
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Ryan S. Wilson
Peter Malamas
Brent Dembo
Sumeet K. Lall
Ninad Zaman
Brandon R. Peterson
The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
description Abstract Background The CADILLAC risk score was developed to identify patients at low risk for adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods We performed a single center retrospective review of STEMI hospitalizations treated with PPCI from 2014 to 2018. Patients were stratified using the CADILLAC risk score into low risk, intermediate risk and high risk groups. Patients presenting with cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was adverse clinical events during initial hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were adverse clinical events at 30 days and 1 year following index hospitalization. Results The study included 341 patients. Compared to patients with a low CADILLAC score, adverse clinical events were similar in the intermediate risk group during hospitalization (OR 1.23, CI 0.37–4.05, p 0.733) and at 30 days (OR 2.27, CI 0.93–5.56, p 0.0733) while adverse clinical events were significantly elevated in the high risk group during hospitalization (OR 4.75, CI 1.91–11.84, p 0.0008) and at 30 days (OR 8.73, CI 4.02–18.96, p < 0.0001). At 1 year follow-up, compared to the low risk CADILLAC group (9.4% adverse clinical event rate), cumulative adverse clinical events were significantly higher in the intermediate risk group (22.9% event rate, OR 2.86, CI 1.39–5.89, p 0.0044) and in the elevated risk group (58.6% event rate, OR 13.67, CI 6.81–27.43, p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was 0% for patients defined at low risk by CADILLAC score during hospitalization, as well up to 1 year follow up. On receiver operating curve analysis, discrimination of in-hospital adverse clinical events was fair using CADILLAC (C = 0.66, odds ratio 1.18; 95% CI 1.04–1.33; p = 0.0064) with somewhat better discrimination at 30-day follow-up (C = 0.719) and 1-year follow-up (C = 0.715). Conclusion Patients defined as low risk by the CADILLAC score following a STEMI were associated with lower mortality and adverse clinical event rates during hospitalization and up to 1 year following STEMI when compared to those with an intermediate or high CADILLAC score.
format article
author Ryan S. Wilson
Peter Malamas
Brent Dembo
Sumeet K. Lall
Ninad Zaman
Brandon R. Peterson
author_facet Ryan S. Wilson
Peter Malamas
Brent Dembo
Sumeet K. Lall
Ninad Zaman
Brandon R. Peterson
author_sort Ryan S. Wilson
title The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
title_short The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
title_full The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed The CADILLAC risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following ST elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort cadillac risk score accurately identifies patients at low risk for in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular events following st elevation myocardial infarction
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3a85ef91091546c086c405d7f4b3acf6
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanswilson thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT petermalamas thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT brentdembo thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT sumeetklall thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT ninadzaman thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT brandonrpeterson thecadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT ryanswilson cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT petermalamas cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT brentdembo cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT sumeetklall cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT ninadzaman cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT brandonrpeterson cadillacriskscoreaccuratelyidentifiespatientsatlowriskforinhospitalmortalityandadversecardiovasculareventsfollowingstelevationmyocardialinfarction
_version_ 1718429397422178304