How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.

A 2013 article reported two experiments suggesting that the mere presence of a cellphone (vs. a notebook) can impair the relationship quality between strangers. The purpose of the present research is twofold: (1) closely replicate this article's findings, and (2) examine whether there may be an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claire Linares, Anne-Laure Sellier
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3b02f5f389c7438eb9ef36fe6553e388
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3b02f5f389c7438eb9ef36fe6553e388
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3b02f5f389c7438eb9ef36fe6553e3882021-12-02T20:10:56ZHow bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251451https://doaj.org/article/3b02f5f389c7438eb9ef36fe6553e3882021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251451https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203A 2013 article reported two experiments suggesting that the mere presence of a cellphone (vs. a notebook) can impair the relationship quality between strangers. The purpose of the present research is twofold: (1) closely replicate this article's findings, and (2) examine whether there may be an impact of the mere presence of a phone on creativity, whether at a group- or an individual- level. In two experiments (N = 356 participants, 136 groups), we followed the original procedure in the 2013 article. In particular, groups of participants who had never seen each other before the study had a conversation in the mere presence of either a smartphone or a notebook. The participants then carried out creative tasks, in groups (Studies 1 and 2) or alone (Study 1). In both studies, we failed to replicate the original results on relationship quality. We also failed to find any effect of the mere presence of a phone on creativity. We discuss possible reasons which may have caused differences between our results and the original ones. Our main conclusion is an effect of the mere presence of a phone on relationship quality and creativity is at minimum harder to find than what was previously assumed in the literature. More generally, this research contributes to qualify the view that smartphones are harmful.Claire LinaresAnne-Laure SellierPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0251451 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Claire Linares
Anne-Laure Sellier
How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
description A 2013 article reported two experiments suggesting that the mere presence of a cellphone (vs. a notebook) can impair the relationship quality between strangers. The purpose of the present research is twofold: (1) closely replicate this article's findings, and (2) examine whether there may be an impact of the mere presence of a phone on creativity, whether at a group- or an individual- level. In two experiments (N = 356 participants, 136 groups), we followed the original procedure in the 2013 article. In particular, groups of participants who had never seen each other before the study had a conversation in the mere presence of either a smartphone or a notebook. The participants then carried out creative tasks, in groups (Studies 1 and 2) or alone (Study 1). In both studies, we failed to replicate the original results on relationship quality. We also failed to find any effect of the mere presence of a phone on creativity. We discuss possible reasons which may have caused differences between our results and the original ones. Our main conclusion is an effect of the mere presence of a phone on relationship quality and creativity is at minimum harder to find than what was previously assumed in the literature. More generally, this research contributes to qualify the view that smartphones are harmful.
format article
author Claire Linares
Anne-Laure Sellier
author_facet Claire Linares
Anne-Laure Sellier
author_sort Claire Linares
title How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
title_short How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
title_full How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
title_fullStr How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
title_full_unstemmed How bad is the mere presence of a phone? A replication of Przybylski and Weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
title_sort how bad is the mere presence of a phone? a replication of przybylski and weinstein (2013) and an extension to creativity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3b02f5f389c7438eb9ef36fe6553e388
work_keys_str_mv AT clairelinares howbadisthemerepresenceofaphoneareplicationofprzybylskiandweinstein2013andanextensiontocreativity
AT annelauresellier howbadisthemerepresenceofaphoneareplicationofprzybylskiandweinstein2013andanextensiontocreativity
_version_ 1718374938666074112