Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych

Movement, Gesture, and Gesticulation in Specialist and Non-Specialist Texts The paper presents a comparative study between expressions of the general language and specialist terms with a similar scope. All the analysed expressions of the general language, i.e. mostly units and constructions with th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Celina Heliasz-Nowosielska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR PL RU
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2018
Materias:	gest ruch frazeologia komunikacja niewerbalna Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3b4602d2abf64ee781be00450c1843aa
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3b4602d2abf64ee781be00450c1843aa
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3b4602d2abf64ee781be00450c1843aa2021-11-27T13:00:02ZRuch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych10.12797/LV.13.2017.25.191896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/3b4602d2abf64ee781be00450c1843aa2018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/213https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 Movement, Gesture, and Gesticulation in Specialist and Non-Specialist Texts The paper presents a comparative study between expressions of the general language and specialist terms with a similar scope. All the analysed expressions of the general language, i.e. mostly units and constructions with the morphemes -ruch-, -gest-, pokaz-, and -mig-, describe in contemporary Polish motional actions of humans. As shown by contradiction tests, some of them are in addition limited to only relaying communicatively significant hand movements, revealing the existing linguistic opposition between movement and gesture, cf. -ruch- vs -gest-. An analogous contrast can also be found in the specialist language, cf. e.g. McNeill (1992) or Poggi (2007), where however gesture is used as an umbrella term for all expressive movements, cf. e.g. Kendon (2004), Lynn (2011, 2014). Furthermore, Kendon’s 1980 distinction between gesture and gesticulation understood as expressive hand movements accompanying speech, is considered to be a novel finding. It is however not taken into account that this opposition has been known to the general language for at least several hundred years and may well have been the (unwitting) inspiration for Kendon. This fact emphasizes the usefulness of research into communicative phenomena in the context of analyses of the general (meta)language. Celina Heliasz-NowosielskaKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlegestruchfrazeologiakomunikacja niewerbalnaLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 13, Iss 25 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR PL RU
topic	gest ruch frazeologia komunikacja niewerbalna Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
spellingShingle	gest ruch frazeologia komunikacja niewerbalna Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Celina Heliasz-Nowosielska Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
description	Movement, Gesture, and Gesticulation in Specialist and Non-Specialist Texts The paper presents a comparative study between expressions of the general language and specialist terms with a similar scope. All the analysed expressions of the general language, i.e. mostly units and constructions with the morphemes -ruch-, -gest-, pokaz-, and -mig-, describe in contemporary Polish motional actions of humans. As shown by contradiction tests, some of them are in addition limited to only relaying communicatively significant hand movements, revealing the existing linguistic opposition between movement and gesture, cf. -ruch- vs -gest-. An analogous contrast can also be found in the specialist language, cf. e.g. McNeill (1992) or Poggi (2007), where however gesture is used as an umbrella term for all expressive movements, cf. e.g. Kendon (2004), Lynn (2011, 2014). Furthermore, Kendon’s 1980 distinction between gesture and gesticulation understood as expressive hand movements accompanying speech, is considered to be a novel finding. It is however not taken into account that this opposition has been known to the general language for at least several hundred years and may well have been the (unwitting) inspiration for Kendon. This fact emphasizes the usefulness of research into communicative phenomena in the context of analyses of the general (meta)language.
format	article
author	Celina Heliasz-Nowosielska
author_facet	Celina Heliasz-Nowosielska
author_sort	Celina Heliasz-Nowosielska
title	Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
title_short	Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
title_full	Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
title_fullStr	Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
title_full_unstemmed	Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
title_sort	ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/3b4602d2abf64ee781be00450c1843aa
work_keys_str_mv	AT celinaheliasznowosielska ruchgestgestykulacjawtekstachspecjalistycznychiniespecjalistycznych
_version_	1718408858747011072

Ruch, gest, gestykulacja w tekstach specjalistycznych i niespecjalistycznych

Ejemplares similares