Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–im...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af2021-11-25T18:02:15ZLateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty10.3390/jcm102253802077-0383https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/22/5380https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed.Stefan BauerJocelyn CorbazGeorge S. AthwalGilles WalchWilliam G. BlakeneyMDPI AGarticleReverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)lateralizationbipolar lateralizationBIO-RSAshoulder prosthesisROMMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5380, p 5380 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) lateralization bipolar lateralization BIO-RSA shoulder prosthesis ROM Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) lateralization bipolar lateralization BIO-RSA shoulder prosthesis ROM Medicine R Stefan Bauer Jocelyn Corbaz George S. Athwal Gilles Walch William G. Blakeney Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
description |
Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed. |
format |
article |
author |
Stefan Bauer Jocelyn Corbaz George S. Athwal Gilles Walch William G. Blakeney |
author_facet |
Stefan Bauer Jocelyn Corbaz George S. Athwal Gilles Walch William G. Blakeney |
author_sort |
Stefan Bauer |
title |
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_short |
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full |
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr |
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_sort |
lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanbauer lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT jocelyncorbaz lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT georgesathwal lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT gilleswalch lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty AT williamgblakeney lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty |
_version_ |
1718411673068371968 |