Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–im...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefan Bauer, Jocelyn Corbaz, George S. Athwal, Gilles Walch, William G. Blakeney
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
ROM
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af2021-11-25T18:02:15ZLateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty10.3390/jcm102253802077-0383https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/22/5380https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed.Stefan BauerJocelyn CorbazGeorge S. AthwalGilles WalchWilliam G. BlakeneyMDPI AGarticleReverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)lateralizationbipolar lateralizationBIO-RSAshoulder prosthesisROMMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5380, p 5380 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)
lateralization
bipolar lateralization
BIO-RSA
shoulder prosthesis
ROM
Medicine
R
spellingShingle Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA)
lateralization
bipolar lateralization
BIO-RSA
shoulder prosthesis
ROM
Medicine
R
Stefan Bauer
Jocelyn Corbaz
George S. Athwal
Gilles Walch
William G. Blakeney
Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
description Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed.
format article
author Stefan Bauer
Jocelyn Corbaz
George S. Athwal
Gilles Walch
William G. Blakeney
author_facet Stefan Bauer
Jocelyn Corbaz
George S. Athwal
Gilles Walch
William G. Blakeney
author_sort Stefan Bauer
title Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_short Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_sort lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3b573a616c8a4c1db7bf3b721fcd23af
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanbauer lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT jocelyncorbaz lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT georgesathwal lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT gilleswalch lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT williamgblakeney lateralizationinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
_version_ 1718411673068371968