Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci

In this article – based on selected examples and with no certainty that they have been aptly chosen – I would like to point out and make a preliminary analysis of certain positions in Polish public discourse which currently display striking elements of transference in the sense of Dominick LaCapra’...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Joanna Tokarska‑Bakir
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PL
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:
Law
K
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3b5b9164a78e43f98e818ebbb2454669
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3b5b9164a78e43f98e818ebbb2454669
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3b5b9164a78e43f98e818ebbb24546692021-11-27T13:08:03ZProspero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.021733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/3b5b9164a78e43f98e818ebbb24546692021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/2315https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 In this article – based on selected examples and with no certainty that they have been aptly chosen – I would like to point out and make a preliminary analysis of certain positions in Polish public discourse which currently display striking elements of transference in the sense of Dominick LaCapra’s meaning of the term. They reverberate with reflections of Polish imagined community’s experiences from the Occupation period. In this description, I shall rely on the classic categorisation introduced by Raul Hilberg, successively discussing the identification of subjects with the positions of perpetrator, victim and witness. Joanna Tokarska‑BakirKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticletransference in historical studies and in public memorysymbolic language of the Polish footbal teams banners and slogansvictims, perpetrators and bystanders in Polish public discourse of the second decade of the 21st centurypostmemoryhistorical policyLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 12, Iss 3 (35) (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PL
topic transference in historical studies and in public memory
symbolic language of the Polish footbal teams banners and slogans
victims, perpetrators and bystanders in Polish public discourse of the second decade of the 21st century
postmemory
historical policy
Law
K
Political science
J
spellingShingle transference in historical studies and in public memory
symbolic language of the Polish footbal teams banners and slogans
victims, perpetrators and bystanders in Polish public discourse of the second decade of the 21st century
postmemory
historical policy
Law
K
Political science
J
Joanna Tokarska‑Bakir
Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
description In this article – based on selected examples and with no certainty that they have been aptly chosen – I would like to point out and make a preliminary analysis of certain positions in Polish public discourse which currently display striking elements of transference in the sense of Dominick LaCapra’s meaning of the term. They reverberate with reflections of Polish imagined community’s experiences from the Occupation period. In this description, I shall rely on the classic categorisation introduced by Raul Hilberg, successively discussing the identification of subjects with the positions of perpetrator, victim and witness.
format article
author Joanna Tokarska‑Bakir
author_facet Joanna Tokarska‑Bakir
author_sort Joanna Tokarska‑Bakir
title Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
title_short Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
title_full Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
title_fullStr Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
title_full_unstemmed Prospero i Kurz w lustrze pamięci
title_sort prospero i kurz w lustrze pamięci
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3b5b9164a78e43f98e818ebbb2454669
work_keys_str_mv AT joannatokarskabakir prosperoikurzwlustrzepamieci
_version_ 1718408734484463616