Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide

The paper claims that the renewal schemes, which have been employed as an evolving model in resolving the urbanisation problem, are turned into the instruments of “urbicide” in Istanbul as a political “evolving” model of urban destruction. The concerns arising out of this change of emphasis encompas...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Zeynep Günay
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design 2015
Materias:	Urban renewal urbicide Istanbul Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3b95b545744b4de08be6992133d42abf
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3b95b545744b4de08be6992133d42abf
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3b95b545744b4de08be6992133d42abf2021-11-07T06:24:44ZRenewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide2147-9380https://doaj.org/article/3b95b545744b4de08be6992133d42abf2015-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/index.php/iconarp/article/view/47https://doaj.org/toc/2147-9380The paper claims that the renewal schemes, which have been employed as an evolving model in resolving the urbanisation problem, are turned into the instruments of “urbicide” in Istanbul as a political “evolving” model of urban destruction. The concerns arising out of this change of emphasis encompass conflicts between theory and practice, as well as conflicts between marketing and planning, process and action, authenticity and diversity, users and owners, opportunities and threats. Within this scope, by constructing an urban renewal framework through the exploration of Law on the Protection and the Revitalisation of Deteriorated Historical and Cultural Immovable Assets (2005) and Law on the Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk (2012), the paper intents to discuss the evolving and declining urbanisation patterns in Istanbul by relating them with up-to-date political, economic, technological and socio-economic inferences. Considerable emphasis is placed on the use of examples in Historic Peninsula to illustrate and critically analyze meanings, inputs, outputs and impacts. The paper concludes by addressing in what ways the planning as a profession can manage these evolving and declining models in resolving contradictions stemming from the dichotomy of urbanisation and urbicide in Istanbul.Zeynep GünayKonya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and DesignarticleUrban renewalurbicideIstanbulArchitectureNA1-9428City planningHT165.5-169.9ENIconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Urban renewal urbicide Istanbul Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9
spellingShingle	Urban renewal urbicide Istanbul Architecture NA1-9428 City planning HT165.5-169.9 Zeynep Günay Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
description	The paper claims that the renewal schemes, which have been employed as an evolving model in resolving the urbanisation problem, are turned into the instruments of “urbicide” in Istanbul as a political “evolving” model of urban destruction. The concerns arising out of this change of emphasis encompass conflicts between theory and practice, as well as conflicts between marketing and planning, process and action, authenticity and diversity, users and owners, opportunities and threats. Within this scope, by constructing an urban renewal framework through the exploration of Law on the Protection and the Revitalisation of Deteriorated Historical and Cultural Immovable Assets (2005) and Law on the Transformation of Areas under Disaster Risk (2012), the paper intents to discuss the evolving and declining urbanisation patterns in Istanbul by relating them with up-to-date political, economic, technological and socio-economic inferences. Considerable emphasis is placed on the use of examples in Historic Peninsula to illustrate and critically analyze meanings, inputs, outputs and impacts. The paper concludes by addressing in what ways the planning as a profession can manage these evolving and declining models in resolving contradictions stemming from the dichotomy of urbanisation and urbicide in Istanbul.
format	article
author	Zeynep Günay
author_facet	Zeynep Günay
author_sort	Zeynep Günay
title	Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
title_short	Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
title_full	Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
title_fullStr	Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
title_full_unstemmed	Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide
title_sort	renewal agenda in istanbul: urbanisation vs. urbicide
publisher	Konya Technical University Faculty of Architecture and Design
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/3b95b545744b4de08be6992133d42abf
work_keys_str_mv	AT zeynepgunay renewalagendainistanbulurbanisationvsurbicide
_version_	1718443604121223168

Renewal Agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. Urbicide

Ejemplares similares