Tear meniscus evaluation after microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis, femtosecond laser and femtosmile laser techniques using anterior segment optical coherence tomography

Yasmine Maher Shaaban, Tamer Abdel Fattah Badran Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three different corneal refractive surgeries: microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), femtosecond laser in situ kera...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaaban YM, Badran TA
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3bc70ec2e9e242d0ac086368b23b863d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Yasmine Maher Shaaban, Tamer Abdel Fattah Badran Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of three different corneal refractive surgeries: microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction (FS-SMILE) on 6-month postoperative stability of tear film to provide a basis for selection of operative procedures. Patients and methods: This is a prospective, randomized, comparative study that included 90 eyes of three equal groups of patients. Each group was subjected to a different laser technique: LASIK, FS-LASIK and FS-SMILE. Using anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography (AS-SD-OCT), the lower tear meniscus parameters were measured preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Changes were studied and compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in tear meniscus height (TMH) between FS-SMILE and FS-LASIK in the first week (P = 0.003) and first month (P = 0.002) with no statistically significant difference between both techniques at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In FS-SMILE, TMH returned to 95% of its preoperative level after 1 month. There was no statistically significant difference in TMH between FS-LASIK and microkeratome LASIK techniques after 1 week and 1 month, but there was a statistically significant difference between both techniques in 3 months (P = 0.019) and 6 months (P = 0.032). Tear meniscus area (TMA) showed no statistically significant difference between FS-SMILE and FS-LASIK at all points of follow-up, but there was a statistically significant difference between both techniques and microkeratome LASIK (all P < 0.05). Microkeratome LASIK parameters failed to reach the preoperative level till 6 months. Conclusion: Early recovery of the lower TMH can be achieved as early as 1 month postoperatively with the FS-SMILE technique compared to FS-LASIK and microkeratome LASIK techniques. Keywords: LASIK, tear meniscus, optical coherence tomography