Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis
The purpose of this experiment is to study the effects of treatment with 90% (28.5% volumetric water content (VWC)), 75% (24% VWC), 50% (16% VWC), and 25% (8% VWC) of water requirements on the growth of two djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosana</i> Koidz) varieties (red: RP and yellow: OR) an...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3c08f13c5b4f4a069ae2dcd021f1171d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3c08f13c5b4f4a069ae2dcd021f1171d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3c08f13c5b4f4a069ae2dcd021f1171d2021-11-25T18:44:44ZDifferent Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis10.3390/plants101122792223-7747https://doaj.org/article/3c08f13c5b4f4a069ae2dcd021f1171d2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/11/2279https://doaj.org/toc/2223-7747The purpose of this experiment is to study the effects of treatment with 90% (28.5% volumetric water content (VWC)), 75% (24% VWC), 50% (16% VWC), and 25% (8% VWC) of water requirements on the growth of two djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosana</i> Koidz) varieties (red: RP and yellow: OR) and one quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd) varieties (PI). The results showed that drought stress (8% VWC) significantly reduced plant growth and relative water content, and increased H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA content in <i>C. formosana</i> and <i>C. quinoa</i>. The most significant increase in these parameters was detected in the OR variety. The antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, APX, and GR activities of PI variety under drought treatment (8% VWC), are significantly increased, while GR activity of <i>C. formosana</i> also increased significantly. Additionally, <i>C. formosana</i> and PI variety remained at a stable AsA/DHA ratio, but the GSH/GSSG ratio decreased during drought treatment. Moreover, drought stress increased total soluble sugars and proline content in the PI variety. However, <i>C. formosana</i> proline content was extremely significantly enhanced, and only the OR variety increased the total soluble sugar content at the same time during the vegetative growth period. In summary, <i>C. formosana</i> and <i>C. quinoa</i> have different drought tolerance mechanisms to adapt to being cultivated and produced under severe drought conditions.Pin-Hua LinYun-Yang ChaoMDPI AGarticledrought tolerance mechanismantioxidant capacityoxidative stressosmotic regulationyieldBotanyQK1-989ENPlants, Vol 10, Iss 2279, p 2279 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
drought tolerance mechanism antioxidant capacity oxidative stress osmotic regulation yield Botany QK1-989 |
spellingShingle |
drought tolerance mechanism antioxidant capacity oxidative stress osmotic regulation yield Botany QK1-989 Pin-Hua Lin Yun-Yang Chao Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
description |
The purpose of this experiment is to study the effects of treatment with 90% (28.5% volumetric water content (VWC)), 75% (24% VWC), 50% (16% VWC), and 25% (8% VWC) of water requirements on the growth of two djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosana</i> Koidz) varieties (red: RP and yellow: OR) and one quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd) varieties (PI). The results showed that drought stress (8% VWC) significantly reduced plant growth and relative water content, and increased H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA content in <i>C. formosana</i> and <i>C. quinoa</i>. The most significant increase in these parameters was detected in the OR variety. The antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, APX, and GR activities of PI variety under drought treatment (8% VWC), are significantly increased, while GR activity of <i>C. formosana</i> also increased significantly. Additionally, <i>C. formosana</i> and PI variety remained at a stable AsA/DHA ratio, but the GSH/GSSG ratio decreased during drought treatment. Moreover, drought stress increased total soluble sugars and proline content in the PI variety. However, <i>C. formosana</i> proline content was extremely significantly enhanced, and only the OR variety increased the total soluble sugar content at the same time during the vegetative growth period. In summary, <i>C. formosana</i> and <i>C. quinoa</i> have different drought tolerance mechanisms to adapt to being cultivated and produced under severe drought conditions. |
format |
article |
author |
Pin-Hua Lin Yun-Yang Chao |
author_facet |
Pin-Hua Lin Yun-Yang Chao |
author_sort |
Pin-Hua Lin |
title |
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
title_short |
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
title_full |
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different Drought-Tolerant Mechanisms in Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.) and Djulis (<i>Chenopodium formosanum</i> Koidz.) Based on Physiological Analysis |
title_sort |
different drought-tolerant mechanisms in quinoa (<i>chenopodium quinoa</i> willd.) and djulis (<i>chenopodium formosanum</i> koidz.) based on physiological analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3c08f13c5b4f4a069ae2dcd021f1171d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pinhualin differentdroughttolerantmechanismsinquinoaichenopodiumquinoaiwilldanddjulisichenopodiumformosanumikoidzbasedonphysiologicalanalysis AT yunyangchao differentdroughttolerantmechanismsinquinoaichenopodiumquinoaiwilldanddjulisichenopodiumformosanumikoidzbasedonphysiologicalanalysis |
_version_ |
1718410766024966144 |