Islamic Intellectualism

The Pakistani scholar Fazlur Rahman disagreed with the German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer on elements of philosophical hermeneutics as they bear upon interpretation of texts ‒ in this case, the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Rahman proposed a “double-movement” theory of Qur’ānic interpretation th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Norman K. Swazo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3c1ce498186e4d2fb848a139fc0d0e33
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3c1ce498186e4d2fb848a139fc0d0e33
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3c1ce498186e4d2fb848a139fc0d0e332021-12-02T17:49:35ZIslamic Intellectualism10.35632/ajis.v28i4.3302690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/3c1ce498186e4d2fb848a139fc0d0e332011-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/330https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 The Pakistani scholar Fazlur Rahman disagreed with the German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer on elements of philosophical hermeneutics as they bear upon interpretation of texts ‒ in this case, the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Rahman proposed a “double-movement” theory of Qur’ānic interpretation through which he hoped for the revival and reform of Islamic intellectualism in its encounter with Western modernity, but also with difference from Islamic orthodoxy’s conceptualization of ijtihād. In this paper, I examine Rahman’s concerns as they relate to Gadamer’s general approach to understanding history and textual interpretation. Rahman argued that if Gadamer’s thesis concerning the forestructure1 of human understanding is correct, then Rahman’s theory has no meaning at all. I conclude that there is reason to see Rahman’s theory as consistent with Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, albeit with some modification given Rahman’s focus on psychologism and objectivity as part of his approach to Qur’ānic interpretation. It is the tyranny of hidden prejudices that makes us deaf to what speaks to us in tradition. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method Norman K. SwazoInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 28, Iss 4 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Norman K. Swazo
Islamic Intellectualism
description The Pakistani scholar Fazlur Rahman disagreed with the German philosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer on elements of philosophical hermeneutics as they bear upon interpretation of texts ‒ in this case, the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Rahman proposed a “double-movement” theory of Qur’ānic interpretation through which he hoped for the revival and reform of Islamic intellectualism in its encounter with Western modernity, but also with difference from Islamic orthodoxy’s conceptualization of ijtihād. In this paper, I examine Rahman’s concerns as they relate to Gadamer’s general approach to understanding history and textual interpretation. Rahman argued that if Gadamer’s thesis concerning the forestructure1 of human understanding is correct, then Rahman’s theory has no meaning at all. I conclude that there is reason to see Rahman’s theory as consistent with Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, albeit with some modification given Rahman’s focus on psychologism and objectivity as part of his approach to Qur’ānic interpretation. It is the tyranny of hidden prejudices that makes us deaf to what speaks to us in tradition. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method
format article
author Norman K. Swazo
author_facet Norman K. Swazo
author_sort Norman K. Swazo
title Islamic Intellectualism
title_short Islamic Intellectualism
title_full Islamic Intellectualism
title_fullStr Islamic Intellectualism
title_full_unstemmed Islamic Intellectualism
title_sort islamic intellectualism
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/3c1ce498186e4d2fb848a139fc0d0e33
work_keys_str_mv AT normankswazo islamicintellectualism
_version_ 1718379403405164544