Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?

This paper examines whether an intensification of corporate social responsibility activities adds or destroys firms’ value in Nigeria. Fixed effect regression analytic tool was used to analyze the data from a sample of 56 listed firms on Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) between 2009 and 2018. We follow...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosmas Ikechukwu Asogwa, Osmund Chinweoda Ugwu, Godwin Keres Okoro Okereke, Adedoyin Samuel, Airenvbahihe Igbinedion, Anthonia Uju Uzuagu, Samson Ige Abolarinwa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2020
Materias:
csr
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3c2c1c97b48248ff88e729dda6dc39ed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3c2c1c97b48248ff88e729dda6dc39ed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3c2c1c97b48248ff88e729dda6dc39ed2021-12-02T15:59:51ZCorporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?2331-197510.1080/23311975.2020.1826089https://doaj.org/article/3c2c1c97b48248ff88e729dda6dc39ed2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1826089https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975This paper examines whether an intensification of corporate social responsibility activities adds or destroys firms’ value in Nigeria. Fixed effect regression analytic tool was used to analyze the data from a sample of 56 listed firms on Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) between 2009 and 2018. We followed environmental, social and economic responsibility activities rating based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) disclosure guidelines and Korean Economic Justice Institutes (KEJI) social responsibility efficient interpolation rating formula in the measure of firms’ social responsibility. The study found that firms that engage in intensive social responsibility yielded positive and insignificant effect on firms’ stock value. This implied that an aggressive social responsibility is not the best approach as it possesses the potential to destroy shareholders’ value. On the other hand, we found evidence that medium social responsibility model significantly affected firms’ financial performance (coefficient = 0.165; p-value >0.05), which suggests that the best social responsibility strategy that significantly increases shareholders’ value is the middle course model. A further test showed that generally environmental, social and economic responsibility activities of firms significantly add to firms’ market value (Coefficients = 0.028; 0.216; 0.037; p-values<0.05). However, the degree of the effect is contingent on the intensity of the activities and governance structures. Governance structure and board diversity explained firms’ efficient CSR strategy that promotes middle course strategies while CSR aggressiveness is explained by unitary model of board leadership. Thus, implementation within an industry average performance adds significantly to investors’ value provided that there is effective corporate governance structure.Cosmas Ikechukwu AsogwaOsmund Chinweoda UgwuGodwin Keres Okoro OkerekeAdedoyin SamuelAirenvbahihe IgbinedionAnthonia Uju UzuaguSamson Ige AbolarinwaTaylor & Francis Grouparticlecorporate environmentalcorporate socialcorporate economicvalue addingvalue destroyingcsrintensiveresponsibilityfinancial performanceBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic corporate environmental
corporate social
corporate economic
value adding
value destroying
csr
intensive
responsibility
financial performance
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle corporate environmental
corporate social
corporate economic
value adding
value destroying
csr
intensive
responsibility
financial performance
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Cosmas Ikechukwu Asogwa
Osmund Chinweoda Ugwu
Godwin Keres Okoro Okereke
Adedoyin Samuel
Airenvbahihe Igbinedion
Anthonia Uju Uzuagu
Samson Ige Abolarinwa
Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
description This paper examines whether an intensification of corporate social responsibility activities adds or destroys firms’ value in Nigeria. Fixed effect regression analytic tool was used to analyze the data from a sample of 56 listed firms on Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) between 2009 and 2018. We followed environmental, social and economic responsibility activities rating based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) disclosure guidelines and Korean Economic Justice Institutes (KEJI) social responsibility efficient interpolation rating formula in the measure of firms’ social responsibility. The study found that firms that engage in intensive social responsibility yielded positive and insignificant effect on firms’ stock value. This implied that an aggressive social responsibility is not the best approach as it possesses the potential to destroy shareholders’ value. On the other hand, we found evidence that medium social responsibility model significantly affected firms’ financial performance (coefficient = 0.165; p-value >0.05), which suggests that the best social responsibility strategy that significantly increases shareholders’ value is the middle course model. A further test showed that generally environmental, social and economic responsibility activities of firms significantly add to firms’ market value (Coefficients = 0.028; 0.216; 0.037; p-values<0.05). However, the degree of the effect is contingent on the intensity of the activities and governance structures. Governance structure and board diversity explained firms’ efficient CSR strategy that promotes middle course strategies while CSR aggressiveness is explained by unitary model of board leadership. Thus, implementation within an industry average performance adds significantly to investors’ value provided that there is effective corporate governance structure.
format article
author Cosmas Ikechukwu Asogwa
Osmund Chinweoda Ugwu
Godwin Keres Okoro Okereke
Adedoyin Samuel
Airenvbahihe Igbinedion
Anthonia Uju Uzuagu
Samson Ige Abolarinwa
author_facet Cosmas Ikechukwu Asogwa
Osmund Chinweoda Ugwu
Godwin Keres Okoro Okereke
Adedoyin Samuel
Airenvbahihe Igbinedion
Anthonia Uju Uzuagu
Samson Ige Abolarinwa
author_sort Cosmas Ikechukwu Asogwa
title Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
title_short Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
title_full Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
title_fullStr Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
title_full_unstemmed Corporate social responsibility intensity: Shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
title_sort corporate social responsibility intensity: shareholders’ value adding or destroying?
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/3c2c1c97b48248ff88e729dda6dc39ed
work_keys_str_mv AT cosmasikechukwuasogwa corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT osmundchinweodaugwu corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT godwinkeresokorookereke corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT adedoyinsamuel corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT airenvbahiheigbinedion corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT anthoniaujuuzuagu corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
AT samsonigeabolarinwa corporatesocialresponsibilityintensityshareholdersvalueaddingordestroying
_version_ 1718385323129438208