Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data

Numerous studies have found evidence that GWAS loci experience negative selection, which increases in intensity with the effect size of identified variants. However, there is also accumulating evidence that this selection is not entirely mediated by the focal trait and contains a substantial pleiotr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evan M. Koch, Shamil R. Sunyaev
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3c50ac8de3484bfab77b15b9934cc6ab
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3c50ac8de3484bfab77b15b9934cc6ab
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3c50ac8de3484bfab77b15b9934cc6ab2021-11-12T12:28:46ZMaintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data1664-802110.3389/fgene.2021.763363https://doaj.org/article/3c50ac8de3484bfab77b15b9934cc6ab2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.763363/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-8021Numerous studies have found evidence that GWAS loci experience negative selection, which increases in intensity with the effect size of identified variants. However, there is also accumulating evidence that this selection is not entirely mediated by the focal trait and contains a substantial pleiotropic component. Understanding how selective constraint shapes phenotypic variation requires advancing models capable of balancing these and other components of selection, as well as empirical analyses capable of inferring this balance and how it is generated by the underlying biology. We first review the classic theory connecting phenotypic selection to selection at individual loci as well as approaches and findings from recent analyses of negative selection in GWAS data. We then discuss geometric theories of pleiotropic selection with the potential to guide future modeling efforts. Recent findings revealing the nature of pleiotropic genetic variation provide clues to which genetic relationships are important and should be incorporated into analyses of selection, while findings that effect sizes vary between populations indicate that GWAS measurements could be misleading if effect sizes have also changed throughout human history.Evan M. KochEvan M. KochShamil R. SunyaevShamil R. SunyaevFrontiers Media S.A.articlepopulation geneticsgenome-wide association studystatistical geneticsevolutionquantitative geneticsGeneticsQH426-470ENFrontiers in Genetics, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic population genetics
genome-wide association study
statistical genetics
evolution
quantitative genetics
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle population genetics
genome-wide association study
statistical genetics
evolution
quantitative genetics
Genetics
QH426-470
Evan M. Koch
Evan M. Koch
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
description Numerous studies have found evidence that GWAS loci experience negative selection, which increases in intensity with the effect size of identified variants. However, there is also accumulating evidence that this selection is not entirely mediated by the focal trait and contains a substantial pleiotropic component. Understanding how selective constraint shapes phenotypic variation requires advancing models capable of balancing these and other components of selection, as well as empirical analyses capable of inferring this balance and how it is generated by the underlying biology. We first review the classic theory connecting phenotypic selection to selection at individual loci as well as approaches and findings from recent analyses of negative selection in GWAS data. We then discuss geometric theories of pleiotropic selection with the potential to guide future modeling efforts. Recent findings revealing the nature of pleiotropic genetic variation provide clues to which genetic relationships are important and should be incorporated into analyses of selection, while findings that effect sizes vary between populations indicate that GWAS measurements could be misleading if effect sizes have also changed throughout human history.
format article
author Evan M. Koch
Evan M. Koch
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev
author_facet Evan M. Koch
Evan M. Koch
Shamil R. Sunyaev
Shamil R. Sunyaev
author_sort Evan M. Koch
title Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
title_short Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
title_full Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
title_fullStr Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance of Complex Trait Variation: Classic Theory and Modern Data
title_sort maintenance of complex trait variation: classic theory and modern data
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3c50ac8de3484bfab77b15b9934cc6ab
work_keys_str_mv AT evanmkoch maintenanceofcomplextraitvariationclassictheoryandmoderndata
AT evanmkoch maintenanceofcomplextraitvariationclassictheoryandmoderndata
AT shamilrsunyaev maintenanceofcomplextraitvariationclassictheoryandmoderndata
AT shamilrsunyaev maintenanceofcomplextraitvariationclassictheoryandmoderndata
_version_ 1718430490862551040