Rare versus common diseases: a false dichotomy in precision medicine

Abstract Precision medicine initiatives are being launched worldwide, each with the capacity to sequence many thousands to millions of human genomes. At the strategic planning level, all are debating the extent to which these resources will be directed towards rare diseases (and cancers) versus comm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brian Hon Yin Chung, Jeffrey Fong Ting Chau, Gane Ka-Shu Wong
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3ca45e3c8a6448cdb0b7af16aa613949
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Precision medicine initiatives are being launched worldwide, each with the capacity to sequence many thousands to millions of human genomes. At the strategic planning level, all are debating the extent to which these resources will be directed towards rare diseases (and cancers) versus common diseases. However, these are not mutually exclusive choices. The organizational and governmental infrastructure created for rare diseases is extensible to common diseases. As we will explain, the underlying technology can also be used to identify drug targets for common diseases with a strategy focused on naturally occurring human knockouts. This flips on its head the prevailing modus operandi of studying people with diseases of interest, shifting the onus to defining traits worth emulating by pharmaceuticals, and searching phenotypically for people with these traits. This also shifts the question of what is rare or common from the many underlying causes to the possibility of a common final pathway.