THE KÜBLER-ROSS FACTOR IN MANAGING THE PERFORMANCE OF TECHNICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
The article proposes to consider the possibility of using the Kübler-Ross model as a mandatory and necessary addition when restoring systems after critical failures, accidents, and other catastrophic events. As stages of the model, it is proposed to consider the “extension” of the classical Küble...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Astana IT University
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3ca6c3f03b0943d596df3bc9c559ff56 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The article proposes to consider the possibility of using the Kübler-Ross model as
a mandatory and necessary addition when restoring systems after critical failures, accidents,
and other catastrophic events. As stages of the model, it is proposed to consider the “extension”
of the classical Kübler-Ross model in the form of an Extended Grief Cycle. Moreover, each
“stage of the model” is considered as a separate “state” of the system. It is also assumed that
the transition from any state of the model is possible not only “linearly forward”, but also in any
other direction. Moreover, the probabilities of such transitions do not depend on the previous
history of the system. Such an assumption allows us to consider the possibility of interpreting
the created model as a Markov model, and, accordingly, to apply the mathematical apparatus
of Markov chains for its study. It is proposed to consider such a characteristic of an effective
recovery system as the “readiness” of a recovery team to transition to a productive state as soon
as possible from the point of view of group dynamics and the effectiveness of the distribution
of team roles. For this, it is proposed to use the logic of the team role model of R. Belbin.
Minimizing the time to achieve the effect of maximum effectiveness in emergency situations
in the context of the concept of incident preparedness and continuity of work, in this case,
will depend not only on technical and other means of response but also on the psychological
stability of the recovery team members, the effective allocation of roles and readiness for
adequate action. This is confirmed by the results of transient modeling. The simulation results
show the dominant value of the probabilities of being in the states of “shock” and “inoperative
system” if you do not control the system purposefully and do not go through all stages of the
Extended Grief Cycle model sequentially, one after another. |
|---|