Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Improving climbing performance strongly depends upon effective training methods. Hangboard training is one of the most popular approaches to increase finger and forearm strength. Training protocols are based on maximizing weight or minimizing edges. We aimed to evaluate which of these proto...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saskia Mundry, Gino Steinmetz, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Arndt F. Schilling, Volker R. Schöffl, Dominik Saul
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3ca7086dbe44457fbd3e44fd8d1e66a8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3ca7086dbe44457fbd3e44fd8d1e66a8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3ca7086dbe44457fbd3e44fd8d1e66a82021-12-02T14:33:51ZHangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial10.1038/s41598-021-92898-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3ca7086dbe44457fbd3e44fd8d1e66a82021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92898-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Improving climbing performance strongly depends upon effective training methods. Hangboard training is one of the most popular approaches to increase finger and forearm strength. Training protocols are based on maximizing weight or minimizing edges. We aimed to evaluate which of these protocols was superior. We prospectively analyzed 30 intermediate to advanced climbing athletes [Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) VI–VIII] and randomized them into three groups: control group C (Control, normal climbing training), hangboard group HE (Hang endurance, grips to hold for a determined time decreased every week), and hangboard group HW (Hang weight, + 1.25 kg weight were added each week to hold for a determined time). As endpoints, we measured the grip strength before and after an 8-week training protocol in seven different pinches. Over the 8-week training period, HW hangboard training significantly improved the climbers’ grip strength compared to C [p = 0.032, effect size (ES) 0.36]. Maximizing weight improved the strength in I/II + III, I/II + III + IV and fist significantly. HW was superior compared to C in terms of grip strength improvement in three out of seven pinches and overall grip strength. The overall changes in the HE group did not differ significantly from the C group. An 8-week training protocol with increasing weights (HW) significantly improved overall grip strength more than a regular climbing training without the use of a hangboard.Saskia MundryGino SteinmetzElizabeth J. AtkinsonArndt F. SchillingVolker R. SchöfflDominik SaulNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Saskia Mundry
Gino Steinmetz
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Arndt F. Schilling
Volker R. Schöffl
Dominik Saul
Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
description Abstract Improving climbing performance strongly depends upon effective training methods. Hangboard training is one of the most popular approaches to increase finger and forearm strength. Training protocols are based on maximizing weight or minimizing edges. We aimed to evaluate which of these protocols was superior. We prospectively analyzed 30 intermediate to advanced climbing athletes [Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme (UIAA) VI–VIII] and randomized them into three groups: control group C (Control, normal climbing training), hangboard group HE (Hang endurance, grips to hold for a determined time decreased every week), and hangboard group HW (Hang weight, + 1.25 kg weight were added each week to hold for a determined time). As endpoints, we measured the grip strength before and after an 8-week training protocol in seven different pinches. Over the 8-week training period, HW hangboard training significantly improved the climbers’ grip strength compared to C [p = 0.032, effect size (ES) 0.36]. Maximizing weight improved the strength in I/II + III, I/II + III + IV and fist significantly. HW was superior compared to C in terms of grip strength improvement in three out of seven pinches and overall grip strength. The overall changes in the HE group did not differ significantly from the C group. An 8-week training protocol with increasing weights (HW) significantly improved overall grip strength more than a regular climbing training without the use of a hangboard.
format article
author Saskia Mundry
Gino Steinmetz
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Arndt F. Schilling
Volker R. Schöffl
Dominik Saul
author_facet Saskia Mundry
Gino Steinmetz
Elizabeth J. Atkinson
Arndt F. Schilling
Volker R. Schöffl
Dominik Saul
author_sort Saskia Mundry
title Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort hangboard training in advanced climbers: a randomized controlled trial
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3ca7086dbe44457fbd3e44fd8d1e66a8
work_keys_str_mv AT saskiamundry hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ginosteinmetz hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT elizabethjatkinson hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT arndtfschilling hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT volkerrschoffl hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dominiksaul hangboardtraininginadvancedclimbersarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718391122741428224