Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates

It is well known that the compressive strength of composite laminates decreases after impact load, even if the impact damage is barely visible in appearance. This compression after impact (CAI) strength is one of the most important design criteria for composite structures. Currently, in order to red...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yukihiro SATO, Kazuhiro MIURA, Masahiro KASHIWAGI, Masayoshi SUHARA, Yoshinori NONAKA, Kouji ESAKI
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3cbe4027b5484a92a2587092ac496981
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3cbe4027b5484a92a2587092ac496981
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3cbe4027b5484a92a2587092ac4969812021-11-26T07:11:27ZProgressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates2187-974510.1299/mej.16-00710https://doaj.org/article/3cbe4027b5484a92a2587092ac4969812017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mej/4/5/4_16-00710/_pdf/-char/enhttps://doaj.org/toc/2187-9745It is well known that the compressive strength of composite laminates decreases after impact load, even if the impact damage is barely visible in appearance. This compression after impact (CAI) strength is one of the most important design criteria for composite structures. Currently, in order to reduce time-consuming model tests and simultaneously ensure structural reliability, analytical or numerical methods are required which are capable of reproducing the actual failure behavior of composite structures (failure mode and load). In this study, impact damage and CAI strength were continuously evaluated by means of numerical progressive failure analysis using dynamic explicit FEA. Since impact and subsequent CAI are dynamic and a static loading processes, respectively, analyses for removing the dynamic effect in the CAI process were performed in the following three steps: 1) impact, 2) relaxation of vibration and 3) CAI. In these analyses, the LaRC failure criteria which take into account fiber-kinking failure mode were employed as stress-based damage initiation criteria, and damage evolution for each lamina was simulated through energy-based damage mechanics. The damage initiation criteria and evolution law were implemented in analyses using the user-subroutine VUMAT of Abaqus/Explicit. In addition, delamination was represented by cohesive elements in stress-based damage initiation criteria and energy-based damage mechanics. As a result of comparison with tests, both of the projected delamination areas caused by impact loading and CAI strength were satisfactorily predicted within an accuracy of ± 15 %. In the CAI simulation, fiber-kinking damage propagated in the direction of width at the maximum applied load, but delamination did not start to propagate. The fiber kinking failure mode was caused by bending due to local buckling at impact area where delamination existed. Accordingly, both of the in-plane fiber kinking damage (which is critical failure mode in CAI) and the delamination (which strongly affects local buckling and subsequent in-plane fiber kinking) are quite important for the accurate prediction of CAI strength.Yukihiro SATOKazuhiro MIURAMasahiro KASHIWAGIMasayoshi SUHARAYoshinori NONAKAKouji ESAKIThe Japan Society of Mechanical Engineersarticlecompositesimpact damagebvidcai strengthprogressive failure analysisMechanical engineering and machineryTJ1-1570ENMechanical Engineering Journal, Vol 4, Iss 5, Pp 16-00710-16-00710 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic composites
impact damage
bvid
cai strength
progressive failure analysis
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
spellingShingle composites
impact damage
bvid
cai strength
progressive failure analysis
Mechanical engineering and machinery
TJ1-1570
Yukihiro SATO
Kazuhiro MIURA
Masahiro KASHIWAGI
Masayoshi SUHARA
Yoshinori NONAKA
Kouji ESAKI
Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
description It is well known that the compressive strength of composite laminates decreases after impact load, even if the impact damage is barely visible in appearance. This compression after impact (CAI) strength is one of the most important design criteria for composite structures. Currently, in order to reduce time-consuming model tests and simultaneously ensure structural reliability, analytical or numerical methods are required which are capable of reproducing the actual failure behavior of composite structures (failure mode and load). In this study, impact damage and CAI strength were continuously evaluated by means of numerical progressive failure analysis using dynamic explicit FEA. Since impact and subsequent CAI are dynamic and a static loading processes, respectively, analyses for removing the dynamic effect in the CAI process were performed in the following three steps: 1) impact, 2) relaxation of vibration and 3) CAI. In these analyses, the LaRC failure criteria which take into account fiber-kinking failure mode were employed as stress-based damage initiation criteria, and damage evolution for each lamina was simulated through energy-based damage mechanics. The damage initiation criteria and evolution law were implemented in analyses using the user-subroutine VUMAT of Abaqus/Explicit. In addition, delamination was represented by cohesive elements in stress-based damage initiation criteria and energy-based damage mechanics. As a result of comparison with tests, both of the projected delamination areas caused by impact loading and CAI strength were satisfactorily predicted within an accuracy of ± 15 %. In the CAI simulation, fiber-kinking damage propagated in the direction of width at the maximum applied load, but delamination did not start to propagate. The fiber kinking failure mode was caused by bending due to local buckling at impact area where delamination existed. Accordingly, both of the in-plane fiber kinking damage (which is critical failure mode in CAI) and the delamination (which strongly affects local buckling and subsequent in-plane fiber kinking) are quite important for the accurate prediction of CAI strength.
format article
author Yukihiro SATO
Kazuhiro MIURA
Masahiro KASHIWAGI
Masayoshi SUHARA
Yoshinori NONAKA
Kouji ESAKI
author_facet Yukihiro SATO
Kazuhiro MIURA
Masahiro KASHIWAGI
Masayoshi SUHARA
Yoshinori NONAKA
Kouji ESAKI
author_sort Yukihiro SATO
title Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
title_short Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
title_full Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
title_fullStr Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
title_full_unstemmed Progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
title_sort progressive failure analysis for impact damage and compressive strength of composite laminates
publisher The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/3cbe4027b5484a92a2587092ac496981
work_keys_str_mv AT yukihirosato progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
AT kazuhiromiura progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
AT masahirokashiwagi progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
AT masayoshisuhara progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
AT yoshinorinonaka progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
AT koujiesaki progressivefailureanalysisforimpactdamageandcompressivestrengthofcompositelaminates
_version_ 1718409713286119424