Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types

Land administration systems differ by their types and practices. The data dissemination practices are considered to be outdated, as in most cases the digitisation of land administration data was conducted to match the paper-based system. This paper reviews four different land administration data dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Josip Križanović, Doris Pivac, Hrvoje Tomić, Siniša Mastelić-Ivić
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	authoritative data open data land administration cadastre Agriculture S
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3cce0a33db9b4679a0cc1c5b0294455c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3cce0a33db9b4679a0cc1c5b0294455c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3cce0a33db9b4679a0cc1c5b0294455c2021-11-25T18:09:27ZReview of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types10.3390/land101111752073-445Xhttps://doaj.org/article/3cce0a33db9b4679a0cc1c5b0294455c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1175https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445XLand administration systems differ by their types and practices. The data dissemination practices are considered to be outdated, as in most cases the digitisation of land administration data was conducted to match the paper-based system. This paper reviews four different land administration data dissemination practices through four case studies, where each selected jurisdiction represents one land administration system type. The analysed LAS data dissemination practices were conducted for Croatia, England, New Zealand and Green County, OH, USA. The main goal of the analysis was to examine the differences and similarities between the respective countries’ land data practices provided by the excerpts related to one parcel. The identified differences and similarities might be of great use when it comes to further improvement and standardisation of land administration data dissemination practices.Josip KrižanovićDoris PivacHrvoje TomićSiniša Mastelić-IvićMDPI AGarticleauthoritative dataopen dataland administrationcadastreAgricultureSENLand, Vol 10, Iss 1175, p 1175 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	authoritative data open data land administration cadastre Agriculture S
spellingShingle	authoritative data open data land administration cadastre Agriculture S Josip Križanović Doris Pivac Hrvoje Tomić Siniša Mastelić-Ivić Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
description	Land administration systems differ by their types and practices. The data dissemination practices are considered to be outdated, as in most cases the digitisation of land administration data was conducted to match the paper-based system. This paper reviews four different land administration data dissemination practices through four case studies, where each selected jurisdiction represents one land administration system type. The analysed LAS data dissemination practices were conducted for Croatia, England, New Zealand and Green County, OH, USA. The main goal of the analysis was to examine the differences and similarities between the respective countries’ land data practices provided by the excerpts related to one parcel. The identified differences and similarities might be of great use when it comes to further improvement and standardisation of land administration data dissemination practices.
format	article
author	Josip Križanović Doris Pivac Hrvoje Tomić Siniša Mastelić-Ivić
author_facet	Josip Križanović Doris Pivac Hrvoje Tomić Siniša Mastelić-Ivić
author_sort	Josip Križanović
title	Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
title_short	Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
title_full	Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
title_fullStr	Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
title_full_unstemmed	Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types
title_sort	review of land administration data dissemination practices: case study on four different land administration system types
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/3cce0a33db9b4679a0cc1c5b0294455c
work_keys_str_mv	AT josipkrizanovic reviewoflandadministrationdatadisseminationpracticescasestudyonfourdifferentlandadministrationsystemtypes AT dorispivac reviewoflandadministrationdatadisseminationpracticescasestudyonfourdifferentlandadministrationsystemtypes AT hrvojetomic reviewoflandadministrationdatadisseminationpracticescasestudyonfourdifferentlandadministrationsystemtypes AT sinisamastelicivic reviewoflandadministrationdatadisseminationpracticescasestudyonfourdifferentlandadministrationsystemtypes
_version_	1718411553946992640

Review of Land Administration Data Dissemination Practices: Case Study on Four Different Land Administration System Types

Ejemplares similares