Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires

Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. F...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Krzysztof Schmeidl, Michal Wieczorowski, Katarzyna Grocholewicz, Michal Mendak, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	Gummetal dynamic friction TiNb orthodontic archwire Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3cfc4595a1a749de9e25287b25684807
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3cfc4595a1a749de9e25287b25684807
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3cfc4595a1a749de9e25287b256848072021-11-11T17:49:34ZFrictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires10.3390/ma142162331996-1944https://doaj.org/article/3cfc4595a1a749de9e25287b256848072021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6233https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted <i>p</i>-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted <i>p</i>-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted <i>p</i>-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties.Krzysztof SchmeidlMichal WieczorowskiKatarzyna GrocholewiczMichal MendakJoanna Janiszewska-OlszowskaMDPI AGarticleGummetaldynamic frictionTiNborthodontic archwireTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6233, p 6233 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Gummetal dynamic friction TiNb orthodontic archwire Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85
spellingShingle	Gummetal dynamic friction TiNb orthodontic archwire Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Krzysztof Schmeidl Michal Wieczorowski Katarzyna Grocholewicz Michal Mendak Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
description	Background. This study aimed to determine the kinetic frictional force (FF) of the recently produced TiNbTaZrO (Gummetal) orthodontic wire and compare it to the widely used wires of stainless steel (SS), nickel-titanium (NiTi), cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium-molybdenum (TiMo) alloys. Methods. Five types of 0.016″ × 0.022″ wires were ligated with elastic ligatures to 0.018″ × 0.025″ SS brackets. The dynamic FFs between the brackets and ligated wires were measured utilizing a specialized tensile tester machine. Prior sample sizes for different archwires were conducted using power analysis for the general linear models. The existence of significant differences in FF between examined materials was initially confirmed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with further evidence of pairwise differences by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test. Results. The pairwise differences between means of kinetic FFs for NiTi, CoCr, and Gummetal wires were not statistically significant (adjusted <i>p</i>-value > 0.05). Stainless steel alloy presented the lowest FF values significantly different from other groups (adjusted <i>p</i>-value < 0.05). On the contrary, TiMo wires showed significantly greater FFs (adjusted <i>p</i>-value < 0.05) than other alloys. Conclusions. Gummetal orthodontic wire exhibits similar frictional resistance as NiTi and CoCr wires. Bendable TiNbTaZrO wire might be used for sliding mechanics due to its favorable frictional properties.
format	article
author	Krzysztof Schmeidl Michal Wieczorowski Katarzyna Grocholewicz Michal Mendak Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska
author_facet	Krzysztof Schmeidl Michal Wieczorowski Katarzyna Grocholewicz Michal Mendak Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska
author_sort	Krzysztof Schmeidl
title	Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_short	Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_full	Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_fullStr	Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_full_unstemmed	Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires
title_sort	frictional properties of the tinbtazro orthodontic wire—a laboratory comparison to popular archwires
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/3cfc4595a1a749de9e25287b25684807
work_keys_str_mv	AT krzysztofschmeidl frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT michalwieczorowski frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT katarzynagrocholewicz frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT michalmendak frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires AT joannajaniszewskaolszowska frictionalpropertiesofthetinbtazroorthodonticwirealaboratorycomparisontopopulararchwires
_version_	1718431996107030528

Frictional Properties of the TiNbTaZrO Orthodontic Wire—A Laboratory Comparison to Popular Archwires

Ejemplares similares