Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrat...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e74542021-12-02T16:49:07ZIdentification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis10.1038/s41598-021-89256-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e74542021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89256-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations and prolactinoma size, and to determine a cut-off PRL value that could differentiate micro- from macro-prolactinomas. A retrospective cohort study of 114 patients diagnosed with prolactinomas between 2007 and 2017 was conducted. All patients underwent gadolinium enhanced pituitary MRI and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. 51.8% of patients in this study were men, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 42.32 ± 15.04 years. 48.2% of the total cohort were found to have microadenomas. Baseline serum PRL concentrations were strongly correlated to tumour dimension (r = 0.750, p = 0.001). When performing the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.976, indicating an excellent accuracy of the diagnostic method. For a value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L), sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 0.932 and 0.891, respectively. When a cut off value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L) was used, specificity was 93.2%, and sensitivity 89.1%, acceptable to reliably differentiate between micro- and macro- adenomas.Bianca M. LecaMaria MytilinaiouMarina TsoliAndreea EpureSimon J. B. AylwinGregory KaltsasHarpal S. RandevaGeorgios K. DimitriadisNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Bianca M. Leca Maria Mytilinaiou Marina Tsoli Andreea Epure Simon J. B. Aylwin Gregory Kaltsas Harpal S. Randeva Georgios K. Dimitriadis Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
description |
Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations and prolactinoma size, and to determine a cut-off PRL value that could differentiate micro- from macro-prolactinomas. A retrospective cohort study of 114 patients diagnosed with prolactinomas between 2007 and 2017 was conducted. All patients underwent gadolinium enhanced pituitary MRI and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. 51.8% of patients in this study were men, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 42.32 ± 15.04 years. 48.2% of the total cohort were found to have microadenomas. Baseline serum PRL concentrations were strongly correlated to tumour dimension (r = 0.750, p = 0.001). When performing the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.976, indicating an excellent accuracy of the diagnostic method. For a value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L), sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 0.932 and 0.891, respectively. When a cut off value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L) was used, specificity was 93.2%, and sensitivity 89.1%, acceptable to reliably differentiate between micro- and macro- adenomas. |
format |
article |
author |
Bianca M. Leca Maria Mytilinaiou Marina Tsoli Andreea Epure Simon J. B. Aylwin Gregory Kaltsas Harpal S. Randeva Georgios K. Dimitriadis |
author_facet |
Bianca M. Leca Maria Mytilinaiou Marina Tsoli Andreea Epure Simon J. B. Aylwin Gregory Kaltsas Harpal S. Randeva Georgios K. Dimitriadis |
author_sort |
Bianca M. Leca |
title |
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
title_short |
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
title_full |
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
title_fullStr |
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
title_sort |
identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT biancamleca identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT mariamytilinaiou identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT marinatsoli identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT andreeaepure identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT simonjbaylwin identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT gregorykaltsas identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT harpalsrandeva identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis AT georgioskdimitriadis identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis |
_version_ |
1718383390797856768 |