Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis

Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianca M. Leca, Maria Mytilinaiou, Marina Tsoli, Andreea Epure, Simon J. B. Aylwin, Gregory Kaltsas, Harpal S. Randeva, Georgios K. Dimitriadis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e74542021-12-02T16:49:07ZIdentification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis10.1038/s41598-021-89256-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e74542021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89256-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations and prolactinoma size, and to determine a cut-off PRL value that could differentiate micro- from macro-prolactinomas. A retrospective cohort study of 114 patients diagnosed with prolactinomas between 2007 and 2017 was conducted. All patients underwent gadolinium enhanced pituitary MRI and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. 51.8% of patients in this study were men, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 42.32 ± 15.04 years. 48.2% of the total cohort were found to have microadenomas. Baseline serum PRL concentrations were strongly correlated to tumour dimension (r = 0.750, p = 0.001). When performing the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.976, indicating an excellent accuracy of the diagnostic method. For a value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L), sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 0.932 and 0.891, respectively. When a cut off value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L) was used, specificity was 93.2%, and sensitivity 89.1%, acceptable to reliably differentiate between micro- and macro- adenomas.Bianca M. LecaMaria MytilinaiouMarina TsoliAndreea EpureSimon J. B. AylwinGregory KaltsasHarpal S. RandevaGeorgios K. DimitriadisNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Bianca M. Leca
Maria Mytilinaiou
Marina Tsoli
Andreea Epure
Simon J. B. Aylwin
Gregory Kaltsas
Harpal S. Randeva
Georgios K. Dimitriadis
Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
description Abstract Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secretory pituitary neoplasms, with a therapeutic management that varies considerably based on tumour size and degree of hyperprolactinemia. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations and prolactinoma size, and to determine a cut-off PRL value that could differentiate micro- from macro-prolactinomas. A retrospective cohort study of 114 patients diagnosed with prolactinomas between 2007 and 2017 was conducted. All patients underwent gadolinium enhanced pituitary MRI and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. 51.8% of patients in this study were men, with a mean age at the time of diagnosis of 42.32 ± 15.04 years. 48.2% of the total cohort were found to have microadenomas. Baseline serum PRL concentrations were strongly correlated to tumour dimension (r = 0.750, p = 0.001). When performing the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.976, indicating an excellent accuracy of the diagnostic method. For a value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L), sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 0.932 and 0.891, respectively. When a cut off value of 204 μg/L (4338 mU/L) was used, specificity was 93.2%, and sensitivity 89.1%, acceptable to reliably differentiate between micro- and macro- adenomas.
format article
author Bianca M. Leca
Maria Mytilinaiou
Marina Tsoli
Andreea Epure
Simon J. B. Aylwin
Gregory Kaltsas
Harpal S. Randeva
Georgios K. Dimitriadis
author_facet Bianca M. Leca
Maria Mytilinaiou
Marina Tsoli
Andreea Epure
Simon J. B. Aylwin
Gregory Kaltsas
Harpal S. Randeva
Georgios K. Dimitriadis
author_sort Bianca M. Leca
title Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_short Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_full Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_fullStr Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_sort identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3d1f5a9291d64e33bc4fcb33f13e7454
work_keys_str_mv AT biancamleca identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT mariamytilinaiou identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT marinatsoli identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT andreeaepure identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT simonjbaylwin identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT gregorykaltsas identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT harpalsrandeva identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT georgioskdimitriadis identificationofanoptimalprolactinthresholdtodetermineprolactinomasizeusingreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
_version_ 1718383390797856768