Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation
Objectives To trial a simplified, time and cost-saving method for remote evaluation of fellowship applications and compare this with existing panel review processes by analysing concordance between funding decisions, and the use of a lottery-based decision method for proposals of similar quality.Des...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Rachel Heyard, Marco Bieri, Katharina Roser |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3d3dcdfd9fab49f7bf409fda423671ee |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Ten simple rules for switching from face-to-face to remote conference: An opportunity to estimate the reduction in GHG emissions.
por: Valentin Guignon, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Experimental study on the behavior of MSE wall having full-height rigid facing and segmental panel-type wall facing
por: Won Myoung-Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Sustainable Math Education of Female Students during a Pandemic: Online versus Face-to-Face Instruction
por: Hanadi Mohamed AbdelSalam, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Muslims and Christians Face to Face
por: Salem A. Salem
Publicado: (1998) -
Face mask uptake in the absence of mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study with Swiss residents
por: Bettina Maria Zimmermann, et al.
Publicado: (2021)