How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.

Emotion effects on cognition have often been reported. However, only few studies investigated emotional effects on subsequent language processing, and in most cases these effects were induced by non-linguistic stimuli such as films, faces, or pictures. Here, we investigated how a paragraph of positi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laura Jiménez-Ortega, Manuel Martín-Loeches, Pilar Casado, Alejandra Sel, Sabela Fondevila, Pilar Herreros de Tejada, Annekathrin Schacht, Werner Sommer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3d4bdf8bff004d35a3fc04ec1cc6803f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3d4bdf8bff004d35a3fc04ec1cc6803f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3d4bdf8bff004d35a3fc04ec1cc6803f2021-11-18T07:23:53ZHow the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0033718https://doaj.org/article/3d4bdf8bff004d35a3fc04ec1cc6803f2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22479432/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Emotion effects on cognition have often been reported. However, only few studies investigated emotional effects on subsequent language processing, and in most cases these effects were induced by non-linguistic stimuli such as films, faces, or pictures. Here, we investigated how a paragraph of positive, negative, or neutral emotional valence affects the processing of a subsequent emotionally neutral sentence, which contained either semantic, syntactic, or no violation, respectively, by means of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Behavioral data revealed strong effects of emotion; error rates and reaction times increased significantly in sentences preceded by a positive paragraph relative to negative and neutral ones. In ERPs, the N400 to semantic violations was not affected by emotion. In the syntactic experiment, however, clear emotion effects were observed on ERPs. The left anterior negativity (LAN) to syntactic violations, which was not visible in the neutral condition, was present in the negative and positive conditions. This is interpreted as reflecting modulatory effects of prior emotions on syntactic processing, which is discussed in the light of three alternative or complementary explanations based on emotion-induced cognitive styles, working memory, and arousal models. The present effects of emotion on the LAN are especially remarkable considering that syntactic processing has often been regarded as encapsulated and autonomous.Laura Jiménez-OrtegaManuel Martín-LoechesPilar CasadoAlejandra SelSabela FondevilaPilar Herreros de TejadaAnnekathrin SchachtWerner SommerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 3, p e33718 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Laura Jiménez-Ortega
Manuel Martín-Loeches
Pilar Casado
Alejandra Sel
Sabela Fondevila
Pilar Herreros de Tejada
Annekathrin Schacht
Werner Sommer
How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
description Emotion effects on cognition have often been reported. However, only few studies investigated emotional effects on subsequent language processing, and in most cases these effects were induced by non-linguistic stimuli such as films, faces, or pictures. Here, we investigated how a paragraph of positive, negative, or neutral emotional valence affects the processing of a subsequent emotionally neutral sentence, which contained either semantic, syntactic, or no violation, respectively, by means of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Behavioral data revealed strong effects of emotion; error rates and reaction times increased significantly in sentences preceded by a positive paragraph relative to negative and neutral ones. In ERPs, the N400 to semantic violations was not affected by emotion. In the syntactic experiment, however, clear emotion effects were observed on ERPs. The left anterior negativity (LAN) to syntactic violations, which was not visible in the neutral condition, was present in the negative and positive conditions. This is interpreted as reflecting modulatory effects of prior emotions on syntactic processing, which is discussed in the light of three alternative or complementary explanations based on emotion-induced cognitive styles, working memory, and arousal models. The present effects of emotion on the LAN are especially remarkable considering that syntactic processing has often been regarded as encapsulated and autonomous.
format article
author Laura Jiménez-Ortega
Manuel Martín-Loeches
Pilar Casado
Alejandra Sel
Sabela Fondevila
Pilar Herreros de Tejada
Annekathrin Schacht
Werner Sommer
author_facet Laura Jiménez-Ortega
Manuel Martín-Loeches
Pilar Casado
Alejandra Sel
Sabela Fondevila
Pilar Herreros de Tejada
Annekathrin Schacht
Werner Sommer
author_sort Laura Jiménez-Ortega
title How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
title_short How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
title_full How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
title_fullStr How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
title_full_unstemmed How the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
title_sort how the emotional content of discourse affects language comprehension.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/3d4bdf8bff004d35a3fc04ec1cc6803f
work_keys_str_mv AT laurajimenezortega howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT manuelmartinloeches howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT pilarcasado howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT alejandrasel howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT sabelafondevila howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT pilarherrerosdetejada howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT annekathrinschacht howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
AT wernersommer howtheemotionalcontentofdiscourseaffectslanguagecomprehension
_version_ 1718423528352514048