Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>Snakebite is a priority neglected tropical disease and causes a range of complications that vary depending on the snake species. Randomised clinical trials have used varied outcome measures that do not allow results to be compared or combined. In accordance with the Co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael Abouyannis, Dinesh Aggarwal, David G Lalloo, Nicholas R Casewell, Mainga Hamaluba, Hanif Esmail
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3d7b7f8820ce442aa56997cabb3fb555
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3d7b7f8820ce442aa56997cabb3fb555
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3d7b7f8820ce442aa56997cabb3fb5552021-12-02T20:23:43ZClinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.1935-27271935-273510.1371/journal.pntd.0009589https://doaj.org/article/3d7b7f8820ce442aa56997cabb3fb5552021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009589https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735<h4>Background</h4>Snakebite is a priority neglected tropical disease and causes a range of complications that vary depending on the snake species. Randomised clinical trials have used varied outcome measures that do not allow results to be compared or combined. In accordance with the Core Outcomes Measurements in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative, this systematic review aims to support the development of a globally relevant core outcome set for snakebite.<h4>Methods</h4>All randomised controlled trials, secondary analyses of randomised controlled trials and study protocols investigating the efficacy of therapeutics for human snakebite envenoming were eligible for inclusion. Study screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by two independent reviewers. All primary and secondary outcome measures were extracted and compiled, as were adverse event outcome measures. Similar outcome measures were grouped into domains. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020196160.<h4>Results</h4>This systematic review included 43 randomised controlled trials, two secondary analyses and 13 study protocols. A total of 382 outcome measures were extracted and, after duplicates were merged, there were 153 unique outcomes. The most frequently used outcome domain ('venom antigenaemia') was included in less than one third of the studies. The unique outcomes were classified into 60 outcome domains. Patient-centred outcomes were used in only three of the studies.<h4>Discussion</h4>Significant heterogeneity in outcome measures exists in snakebite clinical trials. Consensus is needed to select outcome measures that are valid, reliable, patient-centred and feasible. The results of this systematic review strongly support the development of a core outcome set for use in snakebite clinical trials.Michael AbouyannisDinesh AggarwalDavid G LallooNicholas R CasewellMainga HamalubaHanif EsmailPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleArctic medicine. Tropical medicineRC955-962Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 15, Iss 8, p e0009589 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Michael Abouyannis
Dinesh Aggarwal
David G Lalloo
Nicholas R Casewell
Mainga Hamaluba
Hanif Esmail
Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
description <h4>Background</h4>Snakebite is a priority neglected tropical disease and causes a range of complications that vary depending on the snake species. Randomised clinical trials have used varied outcome measures that do not allow results to be compared or combined. In accordance with the Core Outcomes Measurements in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative, this systematic review aims to support the development of a globally relevant core outcome set for snakebite.<h4>Methods</h4>All randomised controlled trials, secondary analyses of randomised controlled trials and study protocols investigating the efficacy of therapeutics for human snakebite envenoming were eligible for inclusion. Study screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by two independent reviewers. All primary and secondary outcome measures were extracted and compiled, as were adverse event outcome measures. Similar outcome measures were grouped into domains. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO: CRD42020196160.<h4>Results</h4>This systematic review included 43 randomised controlled trials, two secondary analyses and 13 study protocols. A total of 382 outcome measures were extracted and, after duplicates were merged, there were 153 unique outcomes. The most frequently used outcome domain ('venom antigenaemia') was included in less than one third of the studies. The unique outcomes were classified into 60 outcome domains. Patient-centred outcomes were used in only three of the studies.<h4>Discussion</h4>Significant heterogeneity in outcome measures exists in snakebite clinical trials. Consensus is needed to select outcome measures that are valid, reliable, patient-centred and feasible. The results of this systematic review strongly support the development of a core outcome set for use in snakebite clinical trials.
format article
author Michael Abouyannis
Dinesh Aggarwal
David G Lalloo
Nicholas R Casewell
Mainga Hamaluba
Hanif Esmail
author_facet Michael Abouyannis
Dinesh Aggarwal
David G Lalloo
Nicholas R Casewell
Mainga Hamaluba
Hanif Esmail
author_sort Michael Abouyannis
title Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
title_short Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
title_full Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.
title_sort clinical outcomes and outcome measurement tools reported in randomised controlled trials of treatment for snakebite envenoming: a systematic review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3d7b7f8820ce442aa56997cabb3fb555
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelabouyannis clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
AT dineshaggarwal clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
AT davidglalloo clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
AT nicholasrcasewell clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
AT maingahamaluba clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
AT hanifesmail clinicaloutcomesandoutcomemeasurementtoolsreportedinrandomisedcontrolledtrialsoftreatmentforsnakebiteenvenomingasystematicreview
_version_ 1718374100531937280