How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study

The aim of the study was to assess the role of illness perception in adaptation to chronic disease among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The differences between the obtained configurations of the illness perception components during four measurements and the model of pre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jagoda Różycka
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3da8aa9e896e4307a38893a8afd7bd42
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3da8aa9e896e4307a38893a8afd7bd42
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3da8aa9e896e4307a38893a8afd7bd422021-11-04T06:49:40ZHow I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/3da8aa9e896e4307a38893a8afd7bd422021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8553031/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203The aim of the study was to assess the role of illness perception in adaptation to chronic disease among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The differences between the obtained configurations of the illness perception components during four measurements and the model of predictions of the values of adaptation indicators, i.e. depression, anxiety and quality of life during subsequent measurements, were analyzed. Illness representation was assessed at baseline via the Illness Representation Questionnaire–Revised. The adaptation indicators–anxiety, depression (measured by HADS) and quality of life (measured by MSIS-29) were measured at baseline and three more times over a five-year period. The k-means cluster analysis (with two-way and repeated measures ANOVA) was conducted in a group of 90 patients (48.89% women and 51.11% men). Subsequently, the mean values of depression, anxiety, physical and psychological quality of life were compared between the clusters using the Kruskall-Wallis test. Finally, a cross-lagged panel modeled for HADS and MSIS-29 subscales in each measurement occasion (T1-T4). Three different illness perception clusters (Anxious, Realistic and Fatalistic Illness Perception named AIP, RIP and FIP) were composed which differentiated the depression, anxiety, quality of life level and age. FIP showed the lowest adaptation outcomes with small differences between AIP and RIP. It was also significantly characterized by the highest age. The positive adaptation indicators were related to the RIP cluster. The model presented rather satisfactory fit (χ2(48) = 81.05; CFI = .968; TLI = .925; SRMR = .050) with slightly inflated RMSEA = .087 (90%CI .053-.120). Based on initial measurements of individual characteristics, it was possible to predict the functioning of patients after several years. For patients with AIP, the covariance of anxiety and depression was significant, for patients with RIP–depression and anxiety, and for patients with FIP–depression. In addition, each of the variables was a predictor of subsequent measurements in particular time intervals, illustrating the dynamics of changes. Results highlight that illness perceptions formed at the beginning of RRMS are important for the process of adaptation to the disease. Moreover, they showed the differences between the adaptation outcomes supporting the idea that a cognitive representation might be important for the level of psychological functioning.Jagoda RóżyckaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jagoda Różycka
How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
description The aim of the study was to assess the role of illness perception in adaptation to chronic disease among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The differences between the obtained configurations of the illness perception components during four measurements and the model of predictions of the values of adaptation indicators, i.e. depression, anxiety and quality of life during subsequent measurements, were analyzed. Illness representation was assessed at baseline via the Illness Representation Questionnaire–Revised. The adaptation indicators–anxiety, depression (measured by HADS) and quality of life (measured by MSIS-29) were measured at baseline and three more times over a five-year period. The k-means cluster analysis (with two-way and repeated measures ANOVA) was conducted in a group of 90 patients (48.89% women and 51.11% men). Subsequently, the mean values of depression, anxiety, physical and psychological quality of life were compared between the clusters using the Kruskall-Wallis test. Finally, a cross-lagged panel modeled for HADS and MSIS-29 subscales in each measurement occasion (T1-T4). Three different illness perception clusters (Anxious, Realistic and Fatalistic Illness Perception named AIP, RIP and FIP) were composed which differentiated the depression, anxiety, quality of life level and age. FIP showed the lowest adaptation outcomes with small differences between AIP and RIP. It was also significantly characterized by the highest age. The positive adaptation indicators were related to the RIP cluster. The model presented rather satisfactory fit (χ2(48) = 81.05; CFI = .968; TLI = .925; SRMR = .050) with slightly inflated RMSEA = .087 (90%CI .053-.120). Based on initial measurements of individual characteristics, it was possible to predict the functioning of patients after several years. For patients with AIP, the covariance of anxiety and depression was significant, for patients with RIP–depression and anxiety, and for patients with FIP–depression. In addition, each of the variables was a predictor of subsequent measurements in particular time intervals, illustrating the dynamics of changes. Results highlight that illness perceptions formed at the beginning of RRMS are important for the process of adaptation to the disease. Moreover, they showed the differences between the adaptation outcomes supporting the idea that a cognitive representation might be important for the level of psychological functioning.
format article
author Jagoda Różycka
author_facet Jagoda Różycka
author_sort Jagoda Różycka
title How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
title_short How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
title_full How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
title_fullStr How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
title_full_unstemmed How I see is how I feel. Identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
title_sort how i see is how i feel. identification of illness perception schema and its association with adaptation outcomes in multiple sclerosis – a 5-year prospective study
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3da8aa9e896e4307a38893a8afd7bd42
work_keys_str_mv AT jagodarozycka howiseeishowifeelidentificationofillnessperceptionschemaanditsassociationwithadaptationoutcomesinmultiplesclerosisa5yearprospectivestudy
_version_ 1718445080449122304