A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d2021-12-02T14:16:07ZA clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer10.1038/s41598-020-79118-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79118-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies—particularly among young adults.José PereaJuan L. GarcíaLuis CorcheteSandra TapialSusana Olmedillas-LópezAlfredo VivasDamián García-OlmoMiguel UriosteAjay GoelRogelio González-SarmientoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q José Perea Juan L. García Luis Corchete Sandra Tapial Susana Olmedillas-López Alfredo Vivas Damián García-Olmo Miguel Urioste Ajay Goel Rogelio González-Sarmiento A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
description |
Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies—particularly among young adults. |
format |
article |
author |
José Perea Juan L. García Luis Corchete Sandra Tapial Susana Olmedillas-López Alfredo Vivas Damián García-Olmo Miguel Urioste Ajay Goel Rogelio González-Sarmiento |
author_facet |
José Perea Juan L. García Luis Corchete Sandra Tapial Susana Olmedillas-López Alfredo Vivas Damián García-Olmo Miguel Urioste Ajay Goel Rogelio González-Sarmiento |
author_sort |
José Perea |
title |
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
title_short |
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
title_full |
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
title_fullStr |
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
title_sort |
clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joseperea aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT juanlgarcia aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT luiscorchete aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT sandratapial aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT susanaolmedillaslopez aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT alfredovivas aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT damiangarciaolmo aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT miguelurioste aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT ajaygoel aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT rogeliogonzalezsarmiento aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT joseperea clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT juanlgarcia clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT luiscorchete clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT sandratapial clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT susanaolmedillaslopez clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT alfredovivas clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT damiangarciaolmo clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT miguelurioste clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT ajaygoel clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer AT rogeliogonzalezsarmiento clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer |
_version_ |
1718391719687356416 |