A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer

Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: José Perea, Juan L. García, Luis Corchete, Sandra Tapial, Susana Olmedillas-López, Alfredo Vivas, Damián García-Olmo, Miguel Urioste, Ajay Goel, Rogelio González-Sarmiento
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d2021-12-02T14:16:07ZA clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer10.1038/s41598-020-79118-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79118-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies—particularly among young adults.José PereaJuan L. GarcíaLuis CorcheteSandra TapialSusana Olmedillas-LópezAlfredo VivasDamián García-OlmoMiguel UriosteAjay GoelRogelio González-SarmientoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
José Perea
Juan L. García
Luis Corchete
Sandra Tapial
Susana Olmedillas-López
Alfredo Vivas
Damián García-Olmo
Miguel Urioste
Ajay Goel
Rogelio González-Sarmiento
A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
description Abstract Rectal cancer (RC) appears to behave differently compared with colon cancer. We aimed to analyze existence of different subtypes of RC depending on distinct features (age of onset and the presence of synchronous primary malignant neoplasms). We compared the clinicopathological, familial and molecular features of three different populations diagnosed with RC (early-onset RC [EORC], late-onset RC, and synchronous RC [SRC]). Eighty-five RCs were identified and were evaluated according to their microsatellite instability, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and chromosomal instability, as assessed by Next Generation Sequencing and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization approaches. The results were subjected to cluster analysis. SRCs displayed the most specific characteristics including a trend for the development of multiple malignant neoplasms, a greater proportion of CIMP-High tumors (75%) and more frequent genomic alterations. These findings were confirmed by a clustering analysis that stratified RCs according to their genomic alterations. We also found that EORCs exhibited their own features including an important familial cancer component and a remarkable rate of mutations in TP53 (53%). Together, heterogeneity in RC characteristics by age of disease-onset and SRC warrants further study to optimize tailored prevention, detection and intervention strategies—particularly among young adults.
format article
author José Perea
Juan L. García
Luis Corchete
Sandra Tapial
Susana Olmedillas-López
Alfredo Vivas
Damián García-Olmo
Miguel Urioste
Ajay Goel
Rogelio González-Sarmiento
author_facet José Perea
Juan L. García
Luis Corchete
Sandra Tapial
Susana Olmedillas-López
Alfredo Vivas
Damián García-Olmo
Miguel Urioste
Ajay Goel
Rogelio González-Sarmiento
author_sort José Perea
title A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
title_short A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
title_full A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
title_fullStr A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed A clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
title_sort clinico-pathological and molecular analysis reveals differences between solitary (early and late-onset) and synchronous rectal cancer
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3db01473c8cc492fa5f9f52c6632c84d
work_keys_str_mv AT joseperea aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT juanlgarcia aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT luiscorchete aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT sandratapial aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT susanaolmedillaslopez aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT alfredovivas aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT damiangarciaolmo aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT miguelurioste aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT ajaygoel aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT rogeliogonzalezsarmiento aclinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT joseperea clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT juanlgarcia clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT luiscorchete clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT sandratapial clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT susanaolmedillaslopez clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT alfredovivas clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT damiangarciaolmo clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT miguelurioste clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT ajaygoel clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
AT rogeliogonzalezsarmiento clinicopathologicalandmolecularanalysisrevealsdifferencesbetweensolitaryearlyandlateonsetandsynchronousrectalcancer
_version_ 1718391719687356416