“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations

This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human ri...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be2021-11-12T10:45:57Z“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations1726-11391816-8590https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be2018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/142https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human rights. That right was termed as a “responsibility to protect”, and confessed by the international community as a political obligation, which did not come in contradiction with the law, rather than as a “law” if nothing else.Stanislav Valentinovich KorostelevNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articleinternational lawunited nations security counciluse of forcelegitimacyhumanitarian interventionresponsibility to protectPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 8, Pp 26-31 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic international law
united nations security council
use of force
legitimacy
humanitarian intervention
responsibility to protect
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
spellingShingle international law
united nations security council
use of force
legitimacy
humanitarian intervention
responsibility to protect
Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
description This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human rights. That right was termed as a “responsibility to protect”, and confessed by the international community as a political obligation, which did not come in contradiction with the law, rather than as a “law” if nothing else.
format article
author Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
author_facet Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
author_sort Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev
title “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
title_short “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
title_full “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
title_fullStr “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
title_full_unstemmed “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
title_sort “responsibility to protect” as a political and legal rationale of uses of force in international relations
publisher North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be
work_keys_str_mv AT stanislavvalentinovichkorostelev responsibilitytoprotectasapoliticalandlegalrationaleofusesofforceininternationalrelations
_version_ 1718430923481939968