“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations
This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human ri...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN RU |
Publicado: |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be2021-11-12T10:45:57Z“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations1726-11391816-8590https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be2018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/142https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human rights. That right was termed as a “responsibility to protect”, and confessed by the international community as a political obligation, which did not come in contradiction with the law, rather than as a “law” if nothing else.Stanislav Valentinovich KorostelevNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articleinternational lawunited nations security counciluse of forcelegitimacyhumanitarian interventionresponsibility to protectPolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 8, Pp 26-31 (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN RU |
topic |
international law united nations security council use of force legitimacy humanitarian intervention responsibility to protect Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
spellingShingle |
international law united nations security council use of force legitimacy humanitarian intervention responsibility to protect Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev “Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
description |
This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention”. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention” is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human rights. That right was termed as a “responsibility to protect”, and confessed by the international community as a political obligation, which did not come in contradiction with the law, rather than as a “law” if nothing else. |
format |
article |
author |
Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev |
author_facet |
Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev |
author_sort |
Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev |
title |
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
title_short |
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
title_full |
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
title_fullStr |
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Responsibility to Protect” as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations |
title_sort |
“responsibility to protect” as a political and legal rationale of uses of force in international relations |
publisher |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3dc175cc3bdf4e22929a2868be2dd8be |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stanislavvalentinovichkorostelev responsibilitytoprotectasapoliticalandlegalrationaleofusesofforceininternationalrelations |
_version_ |
1718430923481939968 |