Cavell’s Method
It may be time to question analytic philosophy’s structural ignorance of the methods of ordinary language philosophy. Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? upsets the analytic tradition to this end, pursuing a “linguistic phenomenology” that focuses on ordinary language use as a resource for describin...
Enregistré dans:
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
MULPress
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/3dd973b1e3594e80b145b65fa26e6fad |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Résumé: | It may be time to question analytic philosophy’s structural ignorance of the methods of ordinary language philosophy. Cavell’s Must We Mean What We Say? upsets the analytic tradition to this end, pursuing a “linguistic phenomenology” that focuses on ordinary language use as a resource for describing the world. Cavell thereby entrusts the tradition with a more ambitious and concrete philosophical task.
|
---|